Rice v. Bauer et al
Filing
83
ORDER adopting in full 82 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/18. Defendants' 68 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the claims against defendants M. Thompson and A. Lanigan and DENIED in all other respects. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
KORDY RICE,
6
No. 2:15-cv-236-JAM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
D. BAUER, et al.,
9
ORDER
Defendants.
10
11
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
12
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
13
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 1, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
14
15
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
16
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
17
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
18
19
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2018, are adopted in full; and
21
22
23
/////
2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 68) is granted with respect to the
24
claims against defendants M. Thompson and A. Lanigan and denied in all other respects.
25
DATED: April 11, 2018
26
/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________
27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?