Rice v. Bauer et al

Filing 83

ORDER adopting in full 82 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/18. Defendants' 68 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the claims against defendants M. Thompson and A. Lanigan and DENIED in all other respects. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 KORDY RICE, 6 No. 2:15-cv-236-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 D. BAUER, et al., 9 ORDER Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 1, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 14 15 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 16 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 17 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 18 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2018, are adopted in full; and 21 22 23 ///// 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 68) is granted with respect to the 24 claims against defendants M. Thompson and A. Lanigan and denied in all other respects. 25 DATED: April 11, 2018 26 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________________ 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?