Rice v. Bauer et al

Filing 93

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/20/18 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California R. LAWRENCE BRAGG, State Bar No. 119194 Supervising Deputy Attorney General MARTHA EHLENBACH, State Bar No. 291582 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7314 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Martha.Ehlenbach@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Bauer and Rodriguez 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 KORDY RICE, 13 2:15-cv-0236 JAM EFB (PC) Plaintiff, 14 v. STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) 15 D. BAUER, et al., 16 Judge: The Honorable Edmund F. Brennan Trial Date: Not Set Defendants. Action Filed: January 28, 2015 17 The parties have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a 18 19 dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice and Order (2:15-cv-0236 JAM EFB (PC)) 1 Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 2 It is so stipulated. 3 4 Dated: 9/12/2018 /s/ Kordy Rice Kordy Rice (V-43736) Plaintiff Dated: 9/12/2018 /s/ Martha Ehlenbach Martha Ehlenbach Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General’s Office Attorney for Defendants Bauer and Rodriguez 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 20, 2018 13 /s/ John A. Mendez John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SA2015300932 33553974.docx 28 2 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice and Order (2:15-cv-0236 JAM EFB (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?