Weston et al v. De La Cruz et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/12/18 ORDERING this action is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROCHELLE WESTON, et al.,

12
13
14
15
16
17

No. 2:15-cv-0240-CMK-P

Plaintiffs,
vs.

ORDER

STELLA DE LA CRUZ, et. al.,
Defendants.
/
Plaintiff Weston is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant

18

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28

19

U.S.C. § 636(c) and no other party has been served or appeared in the action.

20

The court issued an order to show cause on November 2, 2017, requiring plaintiff

21

to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to resolve the fee status and

22

failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a response to the

23

order to show cause could result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute and comply

24

with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response to the

25
26
1

1

order to show cause.1

2
3

The undersigned therefore finds it appropriate to dismiss this action for failure to
prosecute as well as plaintiff’s failure to comply to court rules and orders.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

This action is dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to file an amended

2.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

6

complaint; and

7
8
9

DATED: January 12, 2018

10

______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1

25
26

Although it appears from the file that the order to show cause was returned, the
parties were properly served. It is the responsibility of the parties to keep the court apprised of
their address of record at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the
record address of the party is fully effective.
2