Baker v. Macomber et al
Filing
154
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/10/20 ORDERING on or before Friday, March 27, 2020, plaintiff shall submit to the court all informationnecessary to obtain the trial attendance of his non-expert witnesses. Due to the imminent tr ial date, no extensions of time will be granted absent a showingof compelling need and demonstration that a brief extension of time will lead to the expected result. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff, together with a copy of this order, copies of: (a) the Discovery and Scheduling Order 21 ; (b) the Amended Pretrial Order 134 ; and (c) two blank subpoena forms.(Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY RAY BAKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
No. 2:15-cv-0248 TLN AC P
ORDER
J. MACOMBER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
This prisoner civil rights case is scheduled for trial before the Honorable Troy L. Nunley
18
on April 27, 2020. The Amended Pretrial Order was filed on June 11, 2019. ECF No. 134. An
19
Amended Order and Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum was issued on March 4, 2020,
20
providing for plaintiff’s attendance at trial. ECF No. 153. This order addresses the attendance at
21
trial of plaintiff’s non-expert witnesses.
As set forth in the Amended Pretrial Order, plaintiff identified the following three
22
23
witnesses, ECF No. 134 at 4:
24
1. James L. Davis (inmate)1
25
2. Correctional Officer M. Dulaney
26
27
28
1
In future communications, plaintiff must provide the CDCR Number for this inmate. The
CDCR Inmate Locator website lists one inmate with the name “James L. Davis,” and two
additional inmates named “James Davis” with middle names beginning with “L.”
1
1
2
3. Correctional Officer Olsen
Plaintiff has not submitted the information necessary to obtain the trial attendance of these
3
witnesses. The Amended Pretrial Order directed that “each party is responsible for ensuring the
4
attendance of any witness he intends to call and may not rely on another party to produce the
5
witness.” Id. The process and procedures for ensuring the trial attendance of witnesses was
6
previously set forth by the court in the Discovery and Scheduling Order filed January 4, 2016.
7
ECF No. 21. A copy of that order was sent to plaintiff with the Amended Pretrial Order. ECF
8
No. 134 at 3. Plaintiff was instructed that “[i]nstead of the deadlines set forth in that order,
9
plaintiff shall file and serve any motion for the court’s assistance in obtaining the attendance of a
10
witness at trial at least two months prior to trial.” Id.
11
The filing deadline for plaintiff’s motion was therefore February 27, 2020. The court has
12
waited an additional few days to allow for the mailing of plaintiff’s motion but it has not yet been
13
received. Moreover, review of plaintiff’s Pretrial Statement, ECF No. 121, demonstrates that
14
plaintiff has not yet informed the court of his reasons for identifying these witnesses. With this
15
order, the court will again send plaintiff a copy of the Discovery and Scheduling Order (ECF No.
16
21) which clearly sets forth the standards and procedures for obtaining the attendance of his trial
17
witnesses, which plaintiff should read together with the Amended Pretrial Order (ECF No. 134).
18
In summary, to obtain the attendance of his inmate witness by the court’s issuance of a
19
writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, plaintiff must inform the court, with supporting
20
affidavit(s), whether the witness will testify voluntarily and demonstrate the witness’s actual
21
knowledge of relevant facts.
22
Further, to obtain the attendance of the two correctional officers, the procedures differ
23
depending on whether they agree to testify voluntarily. If they agree to testify, then plaintiff need
24
only inform them of the date and time of trial. If one or both do not agree to testify, plaintiff must
25
prepare and submit a subpoena for service by the United States Marshal and submit a money
26
order, made payable to the witness, for the amount of the witness’s travel expenses plus the
27
required $40.00 daily witness fee. Plaintiff is informed that neither of the identified correctional
28
officers are defendants in this action and neither officers are named in defendant’s list of
2
1
witnesses. See ECF No. 134 at 4. Therefore, the trial attendance of these officers is entirely
2
dependent on plaintiff’s compliance with the court’s instructions.
3
4
Plaintiff will be required to submit all necessary information to the court on or before
Friday, March 27, 2020.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1. On or before Friday, March 27, 2020, plaintiff shall submit to the court all information
7
necessary to obtain the trial attendance of his non-expert witnesses.2
8
9
10
2. Due to the imminent trial date, no extensions of time will be granted absent a showing
of compelling need and demonstration that a brief extension of time will lead to the expected
result.
11
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff, together with a copy of this order,
12
copies of: (a) the Discovery and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 21); (b) the Amended Pretrial Order
13
(ECF No. 134); and (c) two blank subpoena forms.
14
DATED: March 10, 2020
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
This date is the deadline for the court’s receipt of plaintiff’s information, not the date that
plaintiff should submit the information to correctional staff for mailing.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?