Baker v. Macomber et al

Filing 174

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/30/2021 DENYING 173 Motion for Reconsideration. (Rodriguez, E)

Case 2:15-cv-00248-TLN-AC Document 174 Filed 07/30/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TIMOTHY RAY BAKER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:15-cv-0248 TLN AC P

ORDER

J. MACOMBER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff has filed a motion for his request for appointment of counsel to be reviewed de

17
18

novo, ECF No. 173, which appears to seek reconsideration by the undersigned of the July 7, 2021

19

Order denying appointment of counsel.
Local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state “what new or different

20
21

facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior

22

motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion; and . . . why the facts or circumstances were

23

not shown at the time of the prior motion.” L.R. 230(j)(3)-(4). Plaintiff’s motion for

24

reconsideration merely repeats the same arguments that were raised in his motion for appointment

25

of counsel, which have already been considered by the court.

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

Case 2:15-cv-00248-TLN-AC Document 174 Filed 07/30/21 Page 2 of 2
1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, ECF

2

No. 173, is DENIED.

3

DATED: July 30, 2021

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2