Baker v. Macomber et al
Filing
174
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/30/2021 DENYING 173 Motion for Reconsideration. (Rodriguez, E)
Case 2:15-cv-00248-TLN-AC Document 174 Filed 07/30/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY RAY BAKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:15-cv-0248 TLN AC P
ORDER
J. MACOMBER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff has filed a motion for his request for appointment of counsel to be reviewed de
17
18
novo, ECF No. 173, which appears to seek reconsideration by the undersigned of the July 7, 2021
19
Order denying appointment of counsel.
Local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state “what new or different
20
21
facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior
22
motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion; and . . . why the facts or circumstances were
23
not shown at the time of the prior motion.” L.R. 230(j)(3)-(4). Plaintiff’s motion for
24
reconsideration merely repeats the same arguments that were raised in his motion for appointment
25
of counsel, which have already been considered by the court.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
Case 2:15-cv-00248-TLN-AC Document 174 Filed 07/30/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, ECF
2
No. 173, is DENIED.
3
DATED: July 30, 2021
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?