Baker v. Macomber et al
Filing
177
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/06/21 DENYING 176 Motion for a settlement conference. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY RAY BAKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:15-cv-0248 TLN AC P
ORDER
J. MACOMBER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
17
18
§ 1983, has filed a motion for “continual settlement conference offer” that includes an offer to
19
settle the case. ECF No. 176. To the extent the motion seeks the scheduling of a settlement
20
conference, it will be denied. Plaintiff previously requested a settlement conference after his
21
August 2021 trial date was vacated and reset for April 2022, ECF No. 169, and the request was
22
denied after defendant responded that he did not believe a further settlement conference would be
23
fruitful at that time, ECF No. 172. There has been no apparent change in circumstances. If the
24
parties wish to participate in a settlement conference, they may file a joint request to that effect.
25
To the extent plaintiff is making a settlement offer, he is advised that such offers should be
26
directed to defendant’s counsel privately and not filed with the court.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a settlement
2
conference, ECF No. 176, is DENIED.
3
DATED: December 6, 2021
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?