Smith v. People of the State of California

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/2015 ORDERING that the court takes no action on petitioner's 13 "motion to stay state court fugitive hearing", as this case is now closed. Petitioner is informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Fed. R. Civ. P. or the F. R. A. P.. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RADFORD DARRELL SMITH, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-279-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 17 18 On March 11, 2015, the above-captioned case was dismissed without prejudice for failure 19 to exhaust state remedies. Judgment was entered accordingly. On March 13, 2015, petitioner 20 filed a document entitled “Motion to Stay State Court Fugitive Hearing.” The court takes no 21 action on petitioner’s filing as this case is now closed. Petitioner is hereby informed that the 22 court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules 23 of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 24 25 26 27 28 So ordered. Dated: March 19, 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?