Smith v. People of the State of California
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/2015 ORDERING that the court takes no action on petitioner's 13 "motion to stay state court fugitive hearing", as this case is now closed. Petitioner is informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Fed. R. Civ. P. or the F. R. A. P.. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RADFORD DARRELL SMITH,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-279-EFB P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent.
17
18
On March 11, 2015, the above-captioned case was dismissed without prejudice for failure
19
to exhaust state remedies. Judgment was entered accordingly. On March 13, 2015, petitioner
20
filed a document entitled “Motion to Stay State Court Fugitive Hearing.” The court takes no
21
action on petitioner’s filing as this case is now closed. Petitioner is hereby informed that the
22
court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules
23
of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
24
25
26
27
28
So ordered.
Dated: March 19, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?