United States of America v. Singh
Filing
39
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/25/16 ORDERING respondent, Raghvendra Singh to appear 3/16/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan to SHOW CAUSE why he should not be held in contempt of this Court's 32 07/21/15 Order. A copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with the United States' Motion for Contempt, the United States' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Contempt, and the Declaration of Revenue Officer David Palmer, shall be served upon the respondent as soon as practicable after this Order is served upon counsel for the United States. Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 1, above, shall be filed with the Clerk within 3 days of service. If the respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the United States' motion, such defense or opposition shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk and copies served on counsel for the United States in Washington D. C., at least 14 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. The United States may file a reply memorandum to any opposition at least 7 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. At the show cause hearing, the Court will consider all appropriate issues raised by the respondent. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit or declaration will be considered. (Benson, A)
1
CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO
Acting Assistant Attorney General
2
3
4
5
6
NITHYA SENRA
Trial Attorney, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 683
Washington, D.C. 20044
202-307-6570 (v)
202-307-0054 (f)
Nithya.Senra@usdoj.gov
8
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney for the
Eastern District of California
9
Attorneys for the United States of America
7
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
RAGHVENDRA SINGH,
)
)
Respondent.
)
_______________________________________)
Case No. 2:15-cv-287-TLN-EFB
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
17
18
19
20
Upon the motion of the United States, the memorandum in support thereof, and the
Declaration of Revenue Officer David Palmer, it is hereby
ORDERED that the respondent, Raghvendra Singh, appear before United States
21
Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan in that Judge’s courtroom in the United States Courthouse,
22
Sacramento, California on March 16, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. to show cause why he should not be
23
held in contempt of this Court’s Order of July 21, 2015 (ECF No. 32).
1
1
It is further ORDERED that:
2
1.
A copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with the United States’ Motion for
3
Contempt, the United States’ Memorandum in Support of Motion for Contempt, and the
4
Declaration of Revenue Officer David Palmer, shall be served upon the respondent in accordance
5
with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b) as soon as practicable after this Order is served upon counsel for the
6
United States.
7
8
9
2.
Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 1, above, shall be filed with the
Clerk within three (3) days of service.
3.
If the respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the United States’
10
motion, such defense or opposition shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk of Court and
11
copies served on counsel for the United States in Washington D.C., at least 14 days prior to the
12
date set for the show cause hearing. The United States may file a reply memorandum to any
13
opposition at least 7 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing.
14
4.
At the show cause hearing, the Court will consider all appropriate issues raised by
15
the respondent. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and
16
supported by affidavit or declaration will be considered.
17
DATED: January 25, 2016.
18
19
EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?