United States of America v. Singh

Filing 39

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/25/16 ORDERING respondent, Raghvendra Singh to appear 3/16/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan to SHOW CAUSE why he should not be held in contempt of this Court's 32 07/21/15 Order. A copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with the United States' Motion for Contempt, the United States' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Contempt, and the Declaration of Revenue Officer David Palmer, shall be served upon the respondent as soon as practicable after this Order is served upon counsel for the United States. Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 1, above, shall be filed with the Clerk within 3 days of service. If the respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the United States' motion, such defense or opposition shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk and copies served on counsel for the United States in Washington D. C., at least 14 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. The United States may file a reply memorandum to any opposition at least 7 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. At the show cause hearing, the Court will consider all appropriate issues raised by the respondent. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit or declaration will be considered. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 3 4 5 6 NITHYA SENRA Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-307-6570 (v) 202-307-0054 (f) Nithya.Senra@usdoj.gov 8 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California 9 Attorneys for the United States of America 7 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) RAGHVENDRA SINGH, ) ) Respondent. ) _______________________________________) Case No. 2:15-cv-287-TLN-EFB [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 17 18 19 20 Upon the motion of the United States, the memorandum in support thereof, and the Declaration of Revenue Officer David Palmer, it is hereby ORDERED that the respondent, Raghvendra Singh, appear before United States 21 Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan in that Judge’s courtroom in the United States Courthouse, 22 Sacramento, California on March 16, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. to show cause why he should not be 23 held in contempt of this Court’s Order of July 21, 2015 (ECF No. 32). 1 1 It is further ORDERED that: 2 1. A copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with the United States’ Motion for 3 Contempt, the United States’ Memorandum in Support of Motion for Contempt, and the 4 Declaration of Revenue Officer David Palmer, shall be served upon the respondent in accordance 5 with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b) as soon as practicable after this Order is served upon counsel for the 6 United States. 7 8 9 2. Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 1, above, shall be filed with the Clerk within three (3) days of service. 3. If the respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the United States’ 10 motion, such defense or opposition shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk of Court and 11 copies served on counsel for the United States in Washington D.C., at least 14 days prior to the 12 date set for the show cause hearing. The United States may file a reply memorandum to any 13 opposition at least 7 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. 14 4. At the show cause hearing, the Court will consider all appropriate issues raised by 15 the respondent. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and 16 supported by affidavit or declaration will be considered. 17 DATED: January 25, 2016. 18 19 EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?