Joseph v. Hawkins, et al
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER for VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/24/17. Based on the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 34 ), this action is dismissed with prejudice.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KATHLEEN A. KENEALY, State Bar No. 212289
Acting Attorney General of California
JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
MATTHEW ROSS WILSON, State Bar No. 236309
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 322-6372
Fax: (916) 324-5205
E-mail: Matthew.Wilson@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant Hawkins
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
ALONZO JOSEPH,
2:15-cv-00332-JAM-KJN
13
14
v.
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND
PROPOSED ORDER
15
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
16
R. HAWKINS, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the plaintiff Alonzo Joseph and the
19
20
defendant Hawkins stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
3
Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. There is no prevailing party in this
action.
It is so stipulated.
4
5
Dated: January 18, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
6
/s/ Alonzo Joseph
7
Alonzo Joseph
Plaintiff Pro Se
8
9
10
Dated: January 20, 2017
11
12
13
KATHLEEN A. KENEALY
Acting Attorney General of California
JOHN S. ALLIN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
/s/ Matthew Ross Wilson
MATTHEW ROSS WILSON
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendant Hawkins
14
15
16
17
18
ORDER
19
Based on the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 34), this action is dismissed with prejudice.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: January 24, 2017
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/jose0332.stip
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?