Joseph v. Hawkins, et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION and ORDER for VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/24/17. Based on the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 34 ), this action is dismissed with prejudice.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KATHLEEN A. KENEALY, State Bar No. 212289 Acting Attorney General of California JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069 Supervising Deputy Attorney General MATTHEW ROSS WILSON, State Bar No. 236309 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 322-6372 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Matthew.Wilson@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Hawkins 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 ALONZO JOSEPH, 2:15-cv-00332-JAM-KJN 13 14 v. Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND PROPOSED ORDER 15 (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) 16 R. HAWKINS, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the plaintiff Alonzo Joseph and the 19 20 defendant Hawkins stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. There is no prevailing party in this action. It is so stipulated. 4 5 Dated: January 18, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 6 /s/ Alonzo Joseph 7 Alonzo Joseph Plaintiff Pro Se 8 9 10 Dated: January 20, 2017 11 12 13 KATHLEEN A. KENEALY Acting Attorney General of California JOHN S. ALLIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General /s/ Matthew Ross Wilson MATTHEW ROSS WILSON Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Hawkins 14 15 16 17 18 ORDER 19 Based on the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 34), this action is dismissed with prejudice. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: January 24, 2017 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /jose0332.stip

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?