Weltch v. G6 Hospitality, LLC et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/26/2015 ADOPTING the 11 Stipulation; ORDERING Defendants G6 Hospitality LLC and G6 Hospitality Property LLC to respond to the 4 First Amended Complaint by 5/4/2015. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DAVID RAIZMAN, State Bar No. 129407 david.raizman@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: 213.239.9800 Facsimile: 213.239.9045 DANIELLE A. HINTON, State Bar No. 273469 danielle.hinton@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 Attorneys for Defendants G6 HOSPITALITY LLC and G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY LLC 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 SUZANNE JEANNETTE WELTCH, Plaintiff, 16 17 v. 18 G6 HOSPITALITY LLC dba MOTEL 6; G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY LLC, 19 Defendant. 20 Case No. 2:15-cv-00333-JAM-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS G6 HOSPITALITY LLC AND G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 144) 21 Complaint Filed: Complaint Served: Current Response Date: New Response Date: February 9, 2015 February 13, 2015 April 3, 2015 May 4, 2015 22 Trial Date: None Set 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:15-cv-00333-JAM-CMK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS G6 HOSPITALITY LLC AND G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 144) 1 Pursuant to Rule 144 of the Local Rules of this Court, plaintiff Suzanne Jeannette Weltch 2 (“Plaintiff”) and defendants G6 Hospitality LLC and G6 Hospitality Property LLC (collectively, 3 “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and seek a Court order that Defendants will have through and 4 including May 4, 2015, in which to serve and file a response to Plaintiff’s complaint in the action. 5 The Parties continue in their good faith efforts to negotiate an early resolution to this matter that 6 will obviate the need for any litigation activity in this action, including Defendants’ need to file a 7 response to the complaint. Previously, the Parties stipulated to a 28-day extension of time for 8 defendants to respond. [Docket No. 007] No Court dates are affected by this extension of time. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 Respectfully submitted, DATED: _March 24, 2015 12 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 13 14 By: /s/ David Raizman DAVID RAIZMAN DANIELLE A. HINTON 15 16 Attorneys for Defendants G6 HOSPITALITY LLC and G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY LLC 17 18 19 DATED: March 24, 2015 REINER & SLAUGHTER, LLP 20 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ Todd E. Slaughter (as authorized on March 24, 2015) Attorneys for Plaintiff SUZANNE JEANNETTE WELTCH 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 2:15-cv-00333-JAM-CMK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS G6 HOSPITALITY LLC AND G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 144) 1 DATED: March 24, 2015 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC 2 3 4 By: /s/ Scottlynn J. Hubbard IV (as authorized on March 24, 2015) 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUZANNE JEANNETTE WELTCH 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 2:15-cv-00333-JAM-CMK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS G6 HOSPITALITY LLC AND G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 144) 1 2 3 4 ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby adopts the Parties’ Stipulation. Defendants shall have until May 4, 2015 to file a response to Plaintiff’s complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 DATED: 3/26/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 2:15-cv-00333-JAM-CMK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS G6 HOSPITALITY LLC AND G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 144)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?