Oliver v. Gore et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/22/16 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 3/10/16 9 are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand this action back to the Lassen County Superior Court, 6 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY WAYNE OLIVER, 12 No. 2:15-cv-0345 GEB AC P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 R. GORE., et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 10, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 9. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 10, 2016, are adopted in full; and 27 28 //// 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s motion to remand this action back to the Lassen County Superior Court, 2 ECF No. 6, is denied. 3 Dated: April 22, 2016 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?