Zandie v. Hemar, Rousso & Heald, LLP et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/2/2015 DENYING without prejudice 9 Defendant's request to appear by telephone at the Motion to Dismiss hearing set for 4/20/2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6

PAMELA L. COX (STATE BAR NO. 191883)
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP
15910 Ventura Boulevard, 12th Floor
Encino, California 91436
[phone]; (18) 501-2985 (Fax)
e-mail: [e-mail]
Refer to File Number: 3859-20140102-PLC
Attorneys for Defendant
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP

7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

ANN ZANDIE,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
___________________________________ )

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00349-WBS-KJN
Hon. William B. Shubb
Courtroom: 5
[PROPOSED] ORDER AND DEFENDANT
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP’S
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE AT THE HEARING ON
THE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
Date:
April 20, 2015
Time:
2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: 5, 14th Floor

22

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

23

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that counsel for Defendant HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD,

24

LLP (ADefendant@) hereby requests to appear by telephone at the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss

25

Complaint scheduled on April 20, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 of the above-entitled court.

26

///

27

///

28
29
30

1

1

The grounds for this request are defense counsel=s offices are located in Encino,

2

California, and Defendant will incur significant travel expenses if its counsel personally appears at

3

the hearing. The alleged amount in controversy is statutory damages of up to $1,000.00.

4

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Pamela L. Cox, counsel for Defendant

5

HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP will be readily available for the hearing and can be reached

6

at [phone].

7

DATED: April 2, 2015

HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP

8
9

By: __/s/Pamela L. Cox_____________
PAMELA L. COX
Attorneys for Defendant
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP

10
11
12
13

ORDER:
It is too early for the court to determine whether it will require in-person arguments on

14

defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The request to appear telephonically at the hearing is accordingly

15

DENIED at this time, without prejudice to its being renewed after the Opposition and Reply have

16

been filed.

17

Dated: April 2, 2015

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

2

PROOF OF SERVICE

1
2
3
4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

)
)
)

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of

5

eighteen and not a party to the within action. My business address is HEMAR, ROUSSO &

6

HEALD, LLP, ("the business") 15910 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor, Encino, CA 91436-2829.

7
8
9

On April 2, 2015, I served the following document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER
AND DEFENDANT HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP’S REQUEST FOR

10

TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT THE HEARING ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS

11

COMPLAINT on the interested parties in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof in

12

a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

13

Rory C. Leisinger, Esq.
PRICE LAW GROUP, APC
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436

14
15
16
17
18

(By Mail) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collection and processing of
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service; such correspondence
would be deposited with the United States Postal Service the same day of deposit in the
ordinary course of business. Executed on April 2, 2015, at Encino, California.

20

(Federal) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America
that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the
service was made.

21

Executed on April 2, 2015 at Encino, California.

19

22

_________________________________
LISA BATHAUER

23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

3