Zandie v. Hemar, Rousso & Heald, LLP et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/2/2015 DENYING without prejudice 9 Defendant's request to appear by telephone at the Motion to Dismiss hearing set for 4/20/2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 PAMELA L. COX (STATE BAR NO. 191883) HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP 15910 Ventura Boulevard, 12th Floor Encino, California 91436 (818) 501-3800; (18) 501-2985 (Fax) e-mail: pcox@hrhlaw.com Refer to File Number: 3859-20140102-PLC Attorneys for Defendant HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ANN ZANDIE, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ___________________________________ ) CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00349-WBS-KJN Hon. William B. Shubb Courtroom: 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER AND DEFENDANT HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP’S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT THE HEARING ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT Date: April 20, 2015 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 5, 14th Floor 22 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 23 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that counsel for Defendant HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, 24 LLP (ADefendant@) hereby requests to appear by telephone at the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss 25 Complaint scheduled on April 20, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 of the above-entitled court. 26 /// 27 /// 28 29 30 1 1 The grounds for this request are defense counsel=s offices are located in Encino, 2 California, and Defendant will incur significant travel expenses if its counsel personally appears at 3 the hearing. The alleged amount in controversy is statutory damages of up to $1,000.00. 4 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Pamela L. Cox, counsel for Defendant 5 HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP will be readily available for the hearing and can be reached 6 at (818) 501-3800. 7 DATED: April 2, 2015 HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP 8 9 By: __/s/Pamela L. Cox_____________ PAMELA L. COX Attorneys for Defendant HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP 10 11 12 13 ORDER: It is too early for the court to determine whether it will require in-person arguments on 14 defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The request to appear telephonically at the hearing is accordingly 15 DENIED at this time, without prejudice to its being renewed after the Opposition and Reply have 16 been filed. 17 Dated: April 2, 2015 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 2 PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 3 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 5 eighteen and not a party to the within action. My business address is HEMAR, ROUSSO & 6 HEALD, LLP, ("the business") 15910 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor, Encino, CA 91436-2829. 7 8 9 On April 2, 2015, I served the following document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER AND DEFENDANT HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP’S REQUEST FOR 10 TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT THE HEARING ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS 11 COMPLAINT on the interested parties in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof in 12 a sealed envelope addressed as follows: 13 Rory C. Leisinger, Esq. PRICE LAW GROUP, APC 15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100 Encino, CA 91436 14 15 16 17 18 (By Mail) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service; such correspondence would be deposited with the United States Postal Service the same day of deposit in the ordinary course of business. Executed on April 2, 2015, at Encino, California. 20 (Federal) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. 21 Executed on April 2, 2015 at Encino, California. 19 22 _________________________________ LISA BATHAUER 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?