Zandie v. Hemar, Rousso & Heald, LLP et al
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/27/2015 GRANTING 16 Defendant's Request to appear by telephone at the 5/4/2015 motion hearing set for 2:00 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
PAMELA L. COX (STATE BAR NO. 191883)
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP
15910 Ventura Boulevard, 12th Floor
Encino, California 91436
(818) 501-3800; (18) 501-2985 (Fax)
e-mail: pcox@hrhlaw.com
Refer to File Number: 3859-20140102-PLC
Attorneys for Defendant
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ANN ZANDIE,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
___________________________________ )
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00349-WBS-KJN
Hon. William B. Shubb
Courtroom: 5
ORDER AND DEFENDANT HEMAR,
ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP’S REQUEST
FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT
THE HEARING ON THE MOTION TO
DISMISS COMPLAINT
Date:
May 4, 2015
Time:
2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: 5, 14th Floor
22
TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
23
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that counsel for Defendant HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD,
24
LLP (ADefendant@) hereby requests to appear by telephone at the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss
25
Complaint and Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment scheduled on May 4, 2015
26
at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 of the above-entitled court.
27
///
28
29
30
1
1
The grounds for this request are defense counsel=s offices are located in Encino,
2
California, and Defendant will incur significant travel expenses if its counsel personally appears at
3
the hearing. The alleged amount in controversy is statutory damages of up to $1,000.00.
4
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Pamela L. Cox, counsel for Defendant
5
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP will be readily available for the hearing and can be reached
6
at (818) 501-3800.
7
DATED: April 27, 2015
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP
8
By: ___Pamela L. Cox______________
PAMELA L. COX
Attorneys for Defendant
HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP
9
10
11
12
ORDER
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all counsel may appear by phone at the hearing on the Motion to
14
Dismiss Complaint and Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment scheduled on May
15
4, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to
16
participate in the telephone conference call.
17
Dated: April 27, 2015
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
2
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
3
4
5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
)
)
)
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of
6
eighteen and not a party to the within action. My business address is HEMAR, ROUSSO &
7
HEALD, LLP, ("the business") 15910 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor, Encino, CA 91436-2829.
8
9
On April 27, 2014, I served the following document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER
10
AND DEFENDANT HEMAR, ROUSSO & HEALD, LLP’S REQUEST FOR
11
TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT THE HEARING ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS
12
COMPLAINT on the interested parties in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof in
13
a sealed envelope addressed as follows:
14
Rory C. Leisinger, Esq.
PRICE LAW GROUP, APC
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436
15
16
17
18
19
(By Mail) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collection and processing of
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service; such correspondence
would be deposited with the United States Postal Service the same day of deposit in the
ordinary course of business. Executed on April 2, 2015, at Encino, California.
21
(Federal) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America
that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the
service was made.
22
Executed on April 27, 2015 at Encino, California.
20
_________Lisa Bathauer
LISA BATHAUER
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3
____
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?