Smith v. City of Stockton et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 4/8/15 ORDERING that the hearing on defendants' 9 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 5/11/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)

1 LORI RIFKIN – 244081
RIFKIN LAW OFFICE
2 P.O Box 19169
Oakland, California 94619
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
4 Email: [e-mail]
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10
11 Nathaniel Smith,
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14 City of Stockton; Officer Mayer, Officer
Robin Harrison, Officer Michael Perez,
15 and former Chief of Police Blair Ulring, in
their individual capacities; and Chief of
16 Police Eric Jones, in his official capacity,
17

Case No. 2:15-cv-00363-GEB-AC
JOINT STIPULATION &
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
CONTINUATION OF HEARING
DATE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUATION OF HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

1

On March 23, 2105, Defendants City of Stockton and Chief of Police Eric Jones

2 noticed a hearing on their motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint for April 27, 2015.
3 (Doc. No. 10.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(f), the parties jointly submit this stipulation
4 and proposed order for continuation of the hearing date on Defendants’ motion to dismiss
5 to the next available date on the Court’s motion calendar, May 11, 2015. Accordingly,
6 Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion would be filed and served no later than April 27, 2015,
7 and Defendants’ reply would be filed and served no later than May 4, 2015.
8
9 DATED: April 6, 2015
10

Respectfully submitted,
RIFKIN LAW OFFICE

11
12
13

By: /s/ Lori Rifkin
Lori Rifkin

14

Attorney for Plaintiff

15

DATED: April 6, 2015

16

By: /s/ Ted Wood
Ted Wood
Deputy City Attorney

17
18

Attorney for Defendants

19
20
21

The Parties’ request to continue the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss to

22 May 11, 2015 is hereby GRANTED.
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: April 8, 2015
25
26
27
28
1

JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUATION OF HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS