Smith v. City of Stockton et al
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/9/17: HEARING as to 57 MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER CONTINUED to 3/22/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new Joint Statement shall be filed no later than March 15, 2017. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NATHANIEL SMITH,
12
13
No. 2:15-cv-0363 KJM AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
CITY OF STOCKTON; et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
This discovery matter has been referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local
18
Rule”) 302(c)(1). Defendants have filed a Motion for a Protective Order seeking to prevent
19
plaintiff’s deposition of defendant Chief of Police Eric Jones. ECF No. 57. The motion and
20
“Joint Statement” were filed on March 8, 2017, and noticed for hearing on March 15, 2017,
21
apparently because Local Rule 251(a) permits this shortened time period when the motion is filed
22
with the Joint Statement.
23
However, the Joint Statement here is one in name only, as it contains no input from
24
plaintiff. Although the parties have met and conferred, defendant asserts that plaintiff refused to
25
cooperate in the filing of the Joint Statement. In order to avoid an unproductive hearing, and to
26
ensure that the court has input from all interested parties, the hearing will be continued and
27
plaintiff will be ordered to cooperate with the filing of a new Joint Statement, or otherwise
28
explain his position.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The hearing on defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 57) is
3
CONTINUED one week, to March 22, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., before the undersigned.
4
2. Plaintiff and defendants shall cooperate in filing a new Joint Statement. The new Joint
5
Statement shall be filed no later than March 15, 2017.
6
3. If no new Joint Statement (with input from all interested parties) is filed on March 15,
7
2017, counsel for all parties shall file sworn statements no later than March 16, 2017,
8
explaining why no Joint Statement was filed.
9
10
11
4. The parties are cautioned that failure by any party to cooperate in getting a new Joint
Statement filed in a timely manner may result in sanctions.
DATED: March 9, 2017
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?