Thompson v. Colvin
Filing
10
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/27/15. Plaintiff shall show cause within 30 days as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHAWN NOEL THOMPSON,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-CV-0369-CMK
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15
Defendant.
16
/
17
18
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under
19
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security.
20
Pursuant to the court’s scheduling order, plaintiff is required to prosecute this action by either
21
seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 45 days from the date of service
22
of the administrative record by defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result
23
in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and
24
orders. See Local Rule 110. A review of the docket reflects that the answer and certified
25
administrative record were served on June 22, 2015. To date, plaintiff has not filed a dispositive
26
motion.
1
1
Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why
2
this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. Plaintiff is again
3
warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons
4
outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. See id.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
DATED: August 27, 2015
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?