Vann v. Johnson et al

Filing 7

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/16/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a district judge to this action. It is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BUN ROEUNG VANN,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0382 AC P

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, et al.,

15

Respondents.

16
17

A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the

18

postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which

19

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More

20

than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and

21

petitioner has failed to notify the Court of a current address.

22
23
24
25
26

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a district judge
to this action.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for without
prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
1

1

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within

3

fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections

4

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

5

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

DATED: June 16, 2015

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2