Castillo v. ADT, LLC

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER Re Case Schedule 36 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/29/2016: Good cause appearing, the scheduling order is modified as follows: Expert Disclosures Due by July 7, 2016; Rebuttal Expert Disclosures Due by July 2 1, 2016; All Discovery to be Completed by August 4, 2016; Motion for Class Certification shall be filed by September 2, 2016; Other Motions shall be filed by: October 13, 2016; the Final Pretrial Conference is reset for 12/19/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; and the Jury Trial date is reset for 2/22/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 5 Linda Claxton (SBN 125729) linda.claxton@ogletreedeakins.com Alec Hillbo (SBN 287185) alec.hilbo@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213.239.9800 Facsimile: 213.239.9045 6 Attorneys for Defendant ADT LLC 7 Alan Harris (SBN 146079) aharris@harrisandruble.com Priya Mohan (SBN 228984) pmohan@harrisandruble.com HARRIS & RUBLE 655 North Central Avenue, 17th Floor Glendale, California 91203 Telephone: 323.962.3777 Facsimile: 323.962.3004 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 15 David S. Harris (SBN 215224) dsh@northbaylawgroup.com NORTH BAY LAW GROUP 116 E. Blithedale Avenue, Suite #2 Mill Valley, California 92941-2024 Telephone: 415.388.8788 Facsimile: 415.388.8770 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICARDO CASTILLO 13 14 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 RICARDO CASTILLO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 22 23 24 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE Plaintiff, 21 Case No. 2:15-cv-00383-WBS-KJN v. ADT LLC and DOES 1–100, inclusive, Complaint Filed: February 17, 2015 Trial Date: October 18, 2016 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:15-cv-00383-WBS-KJN JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE 1 Defendant ADT LLC (hereinafter, “Defendant”) and Plaintiff Ricardo Castillo (hereinafter, 2 “Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”) respectfully submit this Joint Stipulation Regarding Case 3 Schedule. 4 WHEREAS, in its July 28, 2015 Order on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss/Stay (Document 5 025), the Court stated that the parties may submit a stipulation for the court’s approval to modify 6 the scheduling order. Pursuant that July 28, 2015 Order, the parties submitted a stipulation and on 7 8 September 24, 2015, the Court entered an order modifying the scheduling as follows: Expert Disclosures Due: March 7, 2016 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures Due: March 21, 2016 All Discovery Completed: April 4, 2016 Motion for Class Cert. (filed): May 2, 2016 13 Other Motions (filed): June 13, 2016 14 Pretrial Conference: August 29, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 15 Jury Trial: October 18, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. 16 WHEREAS, since the Court entered the Order dated September 23, 2015, the parties have 9 10 11 12 17 engaged in discovery. The discovery in this matter involves voluminous pay records for a large 18 number of employees over a several year period. Defendant ADT has been working diligently in 19 order to obtain and produce relevant discovery; 20 21 WHEREAS, the parties have identified the documentation and data most relevant to the claims in this action and the parties have agreed to an exchange of a sample of this documentation 22 and data in order to participate in a mediation; 23 24 25 26 WHEREAS, the parties initially had some difficulty finding a mutually convenient date for mediation but have now, in good faith, set a mediation date of March 24, 2016 with mediator Alan Berkowitz, at the Judicate West offices in San Francisco; and 27 WHEREAS, in order to allow the parties to prepare for and participate in the mediation, the 28 parties mutually request that the Court continue certain deadlines in this matter in order to engage 1 Case No. 2:15-cv-00383-WBS-KJN JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE 1 in the mediation process. Specifically, the parties wish to modify the scheduling order and 2 continue the following deadlines by 120 days, as follows: 3 5 6 July 7, 2016 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures Due: July 21, 2016 All Discovery Completed: August 4, 2016 Motion for Class Cert. (filed): September 2, 2016 Other Motions (filed): 4 Expert Disclosures Due: October 13, 2016 7 8 9 10 WHEREAS, the Pretrial Conference is currently scheduled to take place on August 29, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., and a Jury Trial is scheduled to begin on October 18, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. To the 11 extent the parties’ mediation proves unsuccessful, the parties respectfully request that the Court 12 similarly continue by 120 days the dates of the Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, to a date that is 13 convenient for the Court. 14 15 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties. DATED: January 29, 2016 16 17 By: 18 19 /s/ Alec Hillbo Linda Claxton Alec Hillbo Attorneys for Defendant ADT LLC 20 21 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. DATED: January 29, 2016 HARRIS & RUBLE 22 By: /s/ Alan Harris Alan Harris Priya Mohan 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 29, 2016 NORTH BAY LAW GROUP By: /s/ David S. Harris David S. Harris Attorneys for Plaintiff RICARDO CASTILLO 2 Case No. 2:15-cv-00383-WBS-KJN JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE 1 2 3 ORDER Good cause appearing, the scheduling order is modified as follows: 5 6 July 7, 2016 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures Due: July 21, 2016 All Discovery Completed: August 4, 20161 Motion for Class Cert. (filed): September 2, 2016 Other Motions (filed): 4 Expert Disclosures Due: October 13, 2016 Pretrial Conference: December 19, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. Jury Trial: February 22, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED: 13 Dated: January 29, 2016 14 15 16 17 18 19 23684591.1 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 2:15-cv-00383-WBS-KJN JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?