Knox v. First Data Corporation

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/10/15 ORDERING that Defendant shall file its response no later than 5/8/2015. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KEITH CHRESTIONSON (SBN: 130936) RAMON A. MIYAR (SBN: 284990) FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 345 California Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: 415.364.5558 Fax: 415.391.4436 e-mail: kchrestionson@foxrothschild.com rmiyar@foxrothschild.com Attorneys for Defendant FIRST DATA CORPORATION 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 345 California Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 364-5540 Fax: (415) 391-4436 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 Case No. 2:15-cv-00393-JAM-KJN DAVID KNOX, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 17 18 FIRST DATA CORPORATION, and DOES 1-25, Defendants. STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND ORDER Complaint Filed: November 12, 2014 Removed: February 19, 2015 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-00393-JAM-KJN 1 2 3 Pursuant to General Local Rule 144(a), it is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED by and between counsel for Plaintiff, David Knox, and Defendant, First Data Corporation, that Defendant shall have 28 days from April 16, 2015 to answer, move or otherwise plead in 4 response to the Complaint. 5 6 The response to the Complaint is currently due on April 16, 2015 pursuant to an earlier 7 extension. Only two prior extensions have been granted in this matter. During the prior two 8 extensions, counsel for the plaintiff has been diligently attempting to get all of the possible 9 claimants to certain funds in the possession of First Data Corporation to release those claims so FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 345 California Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 364-5540 Fax: (415) 391-4436 10 11 that plaintiff and First Data Corporation could hopefully amicably resolve this matter with total finality. The parties seek a further extension so that counsel for the plaintiff can continue to seek 12 13 14 the release by one last claimant to certain funds so that the parties can avoid pursuing the time and expense associated with an interpleader or otherwise having to litigate these proceedings. 15 The parties believe that the additional time will aid in determining whether the release of the final 16 claimant can be obtained before a responsive pleading is required. Pursuant to this stipulation, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-00393-JAM-KJN 1 Defendant shall file its response no later than May 8, 2015. 2 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP LAW OFFICES OF RANDY E. THOMAS /s/ Ramon A. Miyar ____________ KEITH CHRESTIONSON RAMON A. MIYAR 345 California Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94104 /s/ Jeannine I. Maldonado ___________ RANDY E. THOMAS JEANNINE I. MALDONADO 18826 N. Lower Sacramento Road, Ste. G Woodbridge, CA 95258 Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: April 10, 2015 Dated: April 10, 2015 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 345 California Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 364-5540 Fax: (415) 391-4436 SO ORDERED 11 Dated: April 10, 2015 12 13 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-00393-JAM-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?