Collette v. Vision Security, LLC et al

Filing 50

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/20/18, ORDERING that within 10 days of the date of this Order trial counsel for the parties are directed to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to respond to the courts directions.(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSH COLLETTE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-00426-MCE-DB v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE VISION SECURITY, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On October 13, 2017 the District Court entered a Supplemental Pretrial Conference 17 18 Scheduling Order which among other things, directed the parties to arrange for the scheduling of 19 a settlement conference with the undersigned within 14 days from the date of the Order. ECF No. 20 48 at ¶ III. On March 19, 2018 the parties filed a Stipulation confirming to the conference on 21 April 19, 2018. ECF No. 49 at 2:1-5. On April 11, conflicts arose that required a rescheduling of the conference. The court’s 22 23 records show that the undersigned’s Courtroom Deputy [CRD”] sent the attorneys for the parties 24 an email offering alternate settlement conference dates of May 4 and May 18, 2018 and informed 25 them that a response was required on the same day. Counsel responded that they were not 26 available on the offered dates and requested available dates in June 2018. The CRD then offered 27 them June 8 and June 22, 2018. Neither counsel responded to this email. 28 //// 1 1 In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 Within 10 days of the date of this Order trial counsel for the parties are directed to show 3 cause why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to respond to the court’s directions. 4 Dated: April 20, 2018 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?