Lewis v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 38

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/03/16 ORDERING that, pursuant to 37 Stipulation, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 KEVIN LEWIS, No. 2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB Plaintiff, 18 19 20 vs. ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez RITE AID CORPORATION, 21 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE U.S.D.C. E.D. Cal. No. 2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 86049506.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Kevin Lewis’s claims and this action shall be and hereby are 3 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 Dated: August 3, 2016 6 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE U.S.D.C. E.D. Cal. No. 2:15-CV-00429 JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 86049506.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?