Dearwester v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/2015 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRANK LEE DEWARWESTER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0443 DAD P

v.

ORDER

CDCR et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
By order filed March 25, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

17
18

to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and

19

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

20
21

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).1

22

Dated: May 15, 2015

23
24

DAD:9
dear0443.fta

25
26
27
28

1

Plaintiff has previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636. (Doc. No. 4)
1