Oberg v. Capital One Bank, USA N.A, et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/4/15. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

Danial Oberg,

10
11
12
13
14

No.

2:15-cv-00448-GEB-EFB

Plaintiff,
v.

DISMISSAL ORDER

Capital One Bank, USA N.A.,
a/k/a Capital One Services,
LLC; CACH LLC; and Neuheisel
Law Firm, P.C.,
Defendant.

15
16
17

Plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement on June 8, 2015,

18

in which he stated: “The parties have reached a settlement in the

19

above-referenced

20

stipulation for dismissal within the next twenty-one (21) days.”

21

(Notice, ECF No. 11.) Therefore, an “Order Re Settlement and

22

Disposition”

23

parties to file a dispositional document no later than June 29,

24

2015. (Order, ECF No. 12.) The June 11, 2015 Order notified the

25

parties that the failure to timely file a dispositional document

26

could lead to dismissal of the action. Id. Plaintiff subsequently

27

requested an extension of time to file a dispositional document

28

until July 20, 2015. (ECF No. 13.)

was

case.

filed

The

on

parties

June

1

11,

anticipate

2015,

which

filing

directed

a

the

1

Since no dispositional document has been filed, and the

2

parties have not provided any reason for the continued pendency

3

of this action, this action is dismissed without prejudice.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 4, 2015

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2