Tres Cruzes Land & Cattle LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/26/15 ORDERING that the Herds shall have up to and including May 29, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to Busby's Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 STEPHEN C. SNIDER, SBN 099557 KRISTINA O. LAMBERT, SBN 290403 SNIDER, DIEHL & RASMUSSEN, LLP Attorneys at Law 1111 W. Tokay Street P.O. Box 560 Lodi, CA 95241 (209) 334-5144 (209) 333-1034 (fax) Attorneys for Defendants, GARY HERD and NANCY HERD 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TRES CRUZES LAND & CATTLE, LLC, a ) California limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, A ) SUBSIDIARY OF NATIONWIDE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio ) corporation; GARY HERD, and individual; ) NANCY HERD, an individual; and DOES 1- ) 40, Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) JOHN W. BUSBY II, TRUSTEE OF THE ) EDWARD PESTANA TRUST, an individual ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, A ) SUBSIDIARY OF NATIONWIDE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio ) corporation; GARY HERD, and individual; ) NANCY HERD, an individual; and DOES 1- ) 40, Inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Consolidated Case No.: 2:15-cv-00449-MCE-DAD ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT Current Response Date: May 15, 2015 New Response Date: May 29, 2015 Associated Case No.: 3:15-CV-00881-MCE-DAD SNIDER, DIEHL & RASMUSSEN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1111 W. TOKAY ST. P.O. BOX 560 LODI, CA 95241 (209) 334-5144 (FAX)(209) 333-1034 -118976.10 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 1 2 Plaintiff JOHN W. BUSBY II, TRUSTEE OF THE EDWARD PESTANA TRUST 3 (“Busby”) and Defendants GARY HERD and NANCY HERD (“the Herds”), by and through their 4 counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 144(a), hereby 5 stipulate to an 14-day extension of time to respond to Busby’s Complaint in this matter. 6 Busby filed this action on February 4, 2015, in Alameda County Superior Court. The action 7 was removed to Federal Court on February 26, 2015. Counsel for the Herds accepted service of 8 the Complaint on March 16, 2015. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 9 12(a)(1)(A)(i), the Herds are required to respond to the Complaint on or before May 15, 2013. 10 Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144(a), the Parties stipulate and agree to extend these dates 11 for 14-days to May 29, 2015. The parties agree that good cause exists for this extension to allow 12 the Herds time to respond to the Complaint. There have been no prior extensions of time for the 13 Herds to respond to the Complaint, and there appears to be no prejudice extending the time for the 14 Herds to respond to the Complaint. 15 16 WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the parties stipulate that the Herds shall have up to and 17 including May 29, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to Busby’s Complaint. 18 19 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 20 21 Dated: May 19, 2015. SNIDER, DIEHL & RASMUSSEN, LLP 22 23 By 24 25 /s/ Stephen C. Snider STEPHEN C. SNIDER Attorneys for Defendants, GARY HERD AND NANCY HERD 26 27 /// 28 /// SNIDER, DIEHL & RASMUSSEN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1111 W. TOKAY ST. P.O. BOX 560 LODI, CA 95241 (209) 334-5144 (FAX)(209) 333-1034 -218976.10 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 1 Dated: May19. 2015. BUSBY & ZAPPALA LLP 2 By_ 3 4 5 6 /s/ Erin Sanchez Erin Sanchez Attorneys for Plaintiffs, John W. Busby II, Trustee of the Edward Pestana Trust IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: May 26, 2015 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SNIDER, DIEHL & RASMUSSEN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1111 W. TOKAY ST. P.O. BOX 560 LODI, CA 95241 (209) 334-5144 (FAX)(209) 333-1034 -318976.10 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?