Tres Cruzes Land & Cattle LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/26/15 ORDERING that the Herds shall have up to and including May 29, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to Busby's Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
STEPHEN C. SNIDER, SBN 099557
KRISTINA O. LAMBERT, SBN 290403
SNIDER, DIEHL & RASMUSSEN, LLP
Attorneys at Law
1111 W. Tokay Street
P.O. Box 560
Lodi, CA 95241
(209) 334-5144
(209) 333-1034 (fax)
Attorneys for Defendants, GARY HERD and NANCY HERD
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TRES CRUZES LAND & CATTLE, LLC, a )
California limited liability company,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, A )
SUBSIDIARY OF NATIONWIDE
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio
)
corporation; GARY HERD, and individual; )
NANCY HERD, an individual; and DOES 1- )
40, Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
JOHN W. BUSBY II, TRUSTEE OF THE
)
EDWARD PESTANA TRUST, an individual )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, A )
SUBSIDIARY OF NATIONWIDE
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio
)
corporation; GARY HERD, and individual; )
NANCY HERD, an individual; and DOES 1- )
40, Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Consolidated Case No.:
2:15-cv-00449-MCE-DAD
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
Current Response Date: May 15, 2015
New Response Date: May 29, 2015
Associated Case No.:
3:15-CV-00881-MCE-DAD
SNIDER, DIEHL
& RASMUSSEN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1111 W. TOKAY ST.
P.O. BOX 560
LODI, CA 95241
(209) 334-5144
(FAX)(209) 333-1034
-118976.10
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
1
2
Plaintiff JOHN W. BUSBY II, TRUSTEE OF THE EDWARD PESTANA TRUST
3
(“Busby”) and Defendants GARY HERD and NANCY HERD (“the Herds”), by and through their
4
counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 144(a), hereby
5
stipulate to an 14-day extension of time to respond to Busby’s Complaint in this matter.
6
Busby filed this action on February 4, 2015, in Alameda County Superior Court. The action
7
was removed to Federal Court on February 26, 2015. Counsel for the Herds accepted service of
8
the Complaint on March 16, 2015. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule
9
12(a)(1)(A)(i), the Herds are required to respond to the Complaint on or before May 15, 2013.
10
Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144(a), the Parties stipulate and agree to extend these dates
11
for 14-days to May 29, 2015. The parties agree that good cause exists for this extension to allow
12
the Herds time to respond to the Complaint. There have been no prior extensions of time for the
13
Herds to respond to the Complaint, and there appears to be no prejudice extending the time for the
14
Herds to respond to the Complaint.
15
16
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the parties stipulate that the Herds shall have up to and
17
including May 29, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to Busby’s Complaint.
18
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
20
21
Dated: May 19, 2015.
SNIDER, DIEHL & RASMUSSEN, LLP
22
23
By
24
25
/s/ Stephen C. Snider
STEPHEN C. SNIDER
Attorneys for Defendants,
GARY HERD AND NANCY HERD
26
27
///
28
///
SNIDER, DIEHL
& RASMUSSEN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1111 W. TOKAY ST.
P.O. BOX 560
LODI, CA 95241
(209) 334-5144
(FAX)(209) 333-1034
-218976.10
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
1
Dated: May19. 2015.
BUSBY & ZAPPALA LLP
2
By_
3
4
5
6
/s/ Erin Sanchez
Erin Sanchez
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
John W. Busby II, Trustee of the
Edward Pestana Trust
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: May 26, 2015
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SNIDER, DIEHL
& RASMUSSEN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1111 W. TOKAY ST.
P.O. BOX 560
LODI, CA 95241
(209) 334-5144
(FAX)(209) 333-1034
-318976.10
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?