Garibay v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/28/2015 ORDERING that the deadline for plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED by 45 days to 12/17/2015. (Zignago, K.)
1
4
ROCKWELL, KELLY & DUARTE, LLP
By: Jeffrey R. Duarte
State Bar No 186190
P.O. Box 0142
Modesto, CA 95353
Phone (209) 521-2552
Fax: (209) 526-7898
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
) No. 2:15-cv-00452-DAD
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,
) TO EXTEND TIME
)
vs.
)
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )
)
Defendant
)
BETTY GARIBAY,
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, subject to the approval of the
18
Court, to extend the time by 45 days, to December 17, 2015, for plaintiff to file plaintiff’s
19
Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Remand.
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified
20
21
accordingly.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
-1-
1
This is plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time. Due to plaintiff’s attorney’s
2
attendance at a NOSSCR Conference, a California Applicants Attorneys Association conference
3
and a scheduled vacation, plaintiff’s attorney needs additional time to further review the file and
4
prepare the motion.
5
6
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: September 24, 2015
By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Duarte
JEFFREY R. DUARTE
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: September 24, 2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
7
8
9
10
11
By: /s/ Lynn M. Harada
(As authorized via email)
LYNN M. HARADA
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
17
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 28, 2015
18
19
20
21
Ddad1\orders.soc sec\garibay0452.stip.eot.ord.doc
22
23
24
25
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?