Belyew et al v. Brown et al

Filing 11

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/8/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. F&R submitted to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

TAIT L. BELYEW, et al.,

13

Plaintiffs,

14
15
16

No. 2:15-cv-453-MCE-EFB PS

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR BROWN, et
al.,
Defendants.

17
18

This action, in which plaintiffs are proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the

19
20

undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 13, 2015,

21

the court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the

22

complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiffs thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those

23

deficiencies, and warned plaintiffs that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a

24

recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 9.
The deadline has passed and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise

25
26

responded to the order.

27

/////

28

/////
1

1
2

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the
Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.

3

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

4

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

5

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

6

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

7

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time

8

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455

9

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

10

Dated: September 8, 2015.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2