Cramer v. City of Auburn et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/28/2015 ORDERING 8 the motion to amend is GRANTED; the operative complaint is ECF No. 8-1; the motions for an extension of time 7 , 9 are GRANTED; plaintiff shall complete service of process no later than 30 days from the date of this order; Initial Scheduling Conference scheduled for 10/7/2015 is CONTINUED to 11/4/2015 at 10:10 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID CRAMER,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0462 KJM AC (PS)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CITY OF AUBURN,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff moves to amend his complaint. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff may amend his complaint
18
once as a matter of course before a responsive pleading is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). No
19
responsive pleading having been filed, plaintiff’s motion will be granted.
20
Plaintiff also moves for an extension of time for service of process. It is not clear from the
21
motion how much time plaintiff needs, as the motion indicates that service is expected to be
22
completed by August 13, 2015, even though the motion was filed on August 28, 2015. The court
23
will order service to be completed no later than 30 days from the date of this order, and plaintiff
24
can clarify his motion if he was requesting more time.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. The motion to amend (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED. The operative complaint is ECF
27
28
No. 8-1.
2. The motions for an extension of time (ECF Nos. 7 & 9) are GRANTED. Plaintiff shall
1
1
2
complete service of process no later than 30 days from the date of this order.
3. The Initial Status Conference, currently scheduled for October 7, 2015, is
3
CONTINUED to November 4, 2015, at 10:10 a.m.
4
DATED: August 28, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?