Coryell v. City of Oroville et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/30/17: The discovery deadline currently set for February 10, 2017 be moved to March 10, 2017, for the express and singular purpose of taking the deposition of Plaintiff Lori Coryell. All other discovery shall remain subject to the February 10, 2017 deadline. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BRUCE A. KILDAY, ESQ., SB No. 066415
Email: bkilday@akk-law.com
CARRIE A. McFADDEN, ESQ., SB No. 245199
Email: cfrederickson@akk-law.com
SEAN D. O’DOWD, ESQ., SB No. 296320
Email: sodowd@akk-law.com
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
Attorneys at Law
601 University Avenue, Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 564-6100
Telecopier: (916) 564-6263
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OROVILLE, and OFFICERS JARED COOLEY, JOHN
NICKELSON, and MARCUS TENNEGKEIT
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
LORI CORYELL, individually and as
successor-in-interest to Decedent VICTOR
COLEMAN,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
vs.
CITY OF OROVILLE, a municipal
corporation, et al.,
21
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 15-cv-00476-TLN-DB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING
ORDER
22
COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to the
23
approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following modifications to
24
this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order of April 12, 2016 (Court’s Docket No. 11), regarding the
25
scheduling of this case:
26
That the discovery deadline currently set for February 10, 2017 be moved to March 10,
27
2017, for the express and singular purpose of taking the deposition of Plaintiff Lori
28
Coryell. All other discovery shall remain subject to the February 10, 2017 deadline.
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1
The parties stipulate to and request this modification of the pretrial order as to the
2
discovery cutoff because Plaintiff’s counsel responsible for the deposition recently became
3
unavailable on the date of Plaintiff’s deposition (January 31, 2017), and is not available until
4
after February 10, 2017. No other attorney from Plaintiff’s counsel’s office who is familiar with
5
the case is available due to trials and multiple court appearances within that timeframe. There is
6
good cause for this modification because the parties did not anticipate that no attorney familiar
7
with the case would be unavailable from January 31, 2017 to February 10, 2017 until recently.
8
The parties are confident that continuing Plaintiff’s deposition past the discovery cutoff deadline
9
will not impair or affect any other deadline in this case.
10
11
Dated: January 30, 2017
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
12
By:____/s/ Sean O’Dowd______________
BRUCE A. KILDAY
CARRIE A. FREDERICKSON
SEAN D. O’DOWD
Attorneys for Defendants
13
14
15
16
17
Dated: January 30, 2017
THE LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS
18
By___/s/ Ben Nisenbaum______________
JOHN L. BURRIS
BEN NISENBAUM
JAMES COOK
Attorneys for Plaintiff LORI CORYELL
19
20
21
22
ORDER
23
24
25
26
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, the Pretrial Scheduling Order is modified as
stipulated above.
Dated: January 30, 2017
27
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?