Coryell v. City of Oroville et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/4/17. The Expert Disclosure deadline currently set for 4/6/17 is MOVED to 5/6/2017.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

BRUCE A. KILDAY, ESQ., SB No. 066415
Email: [e-mail]
CARRIE A. McFADDEN, ESQ., SB No. 245199
Email: [e-mail]
SEAN D. O’DOWD, ESQ., SB No. 296320
Email: [e-mail]
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
Attorneys at Law
601 University Avenue, Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Telecopier: [phone]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OROVILLE, and OFFICERS JARED COOLEY, JOHN
NICKELSON, and MARCUS TENNEGKEIT

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16

LORI CORYELL, individually and as
successor-in-interest to Decedent VICTOR
COLEMAN,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20

vs.
CITY OF OROVILLE, a municipal
corporation, et al.,

21

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 15-cv-00476-TLN-DB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING
ORDER

22

COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to the

23

approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following modifications to

24

this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order of April 12, 2016 (Court’s Docket No. 11), regarding the

25

scheduling of this case:


26

2017.

27
28

That the expert disclosure deadline currently set for April 6, 2017 be moved to May 6,

///
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

1

The parties stipulate to and request this modification of the pretrial order as to the expert

2

disclosure deadline because the parties wish to participate in mediation and potentially resolve

3

this case. The parties have been diligently discussing a potential settlement and have agreed to

4

mediation sometime over the next month, and are working in good faith to select a mediator as

5

well as acceptable dates. There is good cause for this modification because the case could

6

potentially be resolved without the need for a trial or the added expense of expert disclosures

7

and/or expert discovery. The parties are confident that continuing the expert disclosure deadline

8

will not impair or affect any other deadline in this case, should the case not settle.

9
10

Dated: April 4, 2017

ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP

11

By:____/s/ Sean O’Dowd______________
BRUCE A. KILDAY
CARRIE A. FREDERICKSON
SEAN D. O’DOWD
Attorneys for Defendants

12
13
14
15
16

Dated: April 4, 2017

THE LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS

17

/s/ Ben Nisenbaum [authorized
4/4/17]
By_______________________________
JOHN L. BURRIS
BEN NISENBAUM
JAMES COOK
Attorneys for Plaintiff LORI CORYELL

18
19
20
21

00121100

22
ORDER

23
24
25
26

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, the Pretrial Scheduling Order is modified as
stipulated above.
Dated: April 4, 2017

27
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

28
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER