Cassells v. Ahlin

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/28/15. The Clerk is directed to assign a District Judge to this case; This Case has been REASSIGNED to Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all furt her proceedings. The New Case Number is: 2:15-cv-00495 MCE KJN (PC). IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due Within fourteen days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY CASSELLS,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-0495 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

PAM AHLIN,
Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff is a civil committee, proceeding pro se. By an order filed March 17, 2015,

18

plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit on the form used by this

19

district, and a certified prison trust account statement within thirty days and was cautioned that

20

failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day

21

period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the

22

required documents.

23
24

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

25

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
1

1

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

3

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

4

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

5

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

Dated: April 28, 2015

7
8
/cass0495.fifp

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2