Cassells v. Ahlin

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/28/15. The Clerk is directed to assign a District Judge to this case; This Case has been REASSIGNED to Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all furt her proceedings. The New Case Number is: 2:15-cv-00495 MCE KJN (PC). IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due Within fourteen days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY CASSELLS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-0495 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PAM AHLIN, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a civil committee, proceeding pro se. By an order filed March 17, 2015, 18 plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit on the form used by this 19 district, and a certified prison trust account statement within thirty days and was cautioned that 20 failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day 21 period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the 22 required documents. 23 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 1 1 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 3 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 4 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 5 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: April 28, 2015 7 8 /cass0495.fifp 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?