California Republican Party v. Asian American Small Business Political Action Committee

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/13/15 ORDERING that the deadline for the defendant's responsive pleading is extended to 04/20/15. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Louis E. Kempinsky (CA State Bar No. 90068)
[e-mail]
Laura D. Castner (CA State Bar No. 172362)
[e-mail]
KEMPINSKY LAW LTD.
11111 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Asian American
Small Business Political Action Committee

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11
12

Case No. 2:15-CV-00505-TLN-AC

CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN PARTY,

13
14
15

STIPULATION FOR SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

Plaintiff,
vs.

16
17
18

ASIAN AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS
POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE,

Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stipulation and Order To Further Extend
Time To Respond To Complaint

-1-

1

Plaintiff California Republican Party and Defendant Asian American Small Business Political

2

Action Committee, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that Defendant shall

3

have a further extension of time up through, and including, April 20, 2015, in which to plead or

4

otherwise respond to the complaint. This is the second such extension sought or received. Defendant

5

and Plaintiff previously stipulated to an extension of ten days, through and including April 10, 2015,

6

for Defendant to plead or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

7

The Court’s approval of this second stipulated ten-day extension is respectfully requested in

8

light of the fact that the parties are, and have been, working to negotiate and document a resolution of

9

all claims, and additional time is required for this process. The total extension of time to which the

10

parties have stipulated is less than twenty-eight (28) days from the date on which Defendant’s

11

response to the complaint was originally due.

12
13

Dated: April 9, 2015

DHILLON LAW GROUP INC.

14
By /s/ Harmeet K. Dhillon (as authorized on 4/9/15)
Harmeet K. Dhillon
Attorneys for Plaintiff

15
16
17
18

Dated: April 9, 2015

19

REED & DAVIDSON, LLP
-andKEMPINSKY LAW LTD.

20
21

By /s/ Louis E. Kempinsky
Louis E. Kempinsky
Attorneys for Defendant

22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25

Dated: April 13, 2015

26

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

27
28

Stipulation and Order To Further Extend
Time To Respond To Complaint

-2-