Grant v. Cal Fire, et al.

Filing 5

ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/7/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DARRYL GRANT,

12

No. 2:15-cv-0508 KJN P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

CAL FIRE, et al.,

15

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.

16
By an order filed March 18, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma

17
18

pauperis affidavit and a certified prison trust account statement within thirty days and was

19

cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

20

The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and

21

has not submitted the required documents.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff

22
23

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current

24

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of

25

the party is fully effective.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign

26
27

a district judge to this case; and

28

////
1

1

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

3

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

4

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

5

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

6

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

7

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

8

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

9

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

10

Dated: May 7, 2015

11
12
/gran0508.fifp

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2