Nichols v. Unknown
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/23/15 ORDERING that Petitioners March 9, 2015 request to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED without prejudice. Petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GERALD EDMUND NICHOLS,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0522 DAD P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
UNKNOWN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. However, petitioner has failed to file his request to proceed
19
in forma pauperis on the form used for this district or else pay the required filing fee ($5.00). See
20
28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the
21
appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the
22
appropriate filing fee.
23
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. Petitioner’s March 9, 2015 request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied
25
26
without prejudice.
2. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in
27
support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner’s
28
failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
1
1
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis
2
form used by this district.
3
Dated: March 23, 2015
4
5
6
7
DAD:10/md
nich0522.101a
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?