Mix v. Ahlin
Filing
5
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/26/2015 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this action. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT MIX,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0524 DAD P
v.
ORDER &
PAM AHLIN,
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a civil detainee at Coalinga State Hospital proceeding pro se, has filed a civil
18
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with an application for leave to proceed in
19
forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
By order filed March 23, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit
20
21
on the form used by this district or else pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days.1
22
Plaintiff was also cautioned that his failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this
23
action be dismissed. More than five months have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an in forma
24
pauperis affidavit on the required form, paid the appropriate filing fee, or otherwise responded to
25
the court’s order.
26
/////
27
28
1
The Clerk of the Court was directed to mail plaintiff a blank Application to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis By a Prisoner. (See ECF No. 4 at 2.)
1
1
2
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall
assign a district judge in this action.
3
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
4
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
5
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
6
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
7
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
8
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
9
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
10
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
11
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
12
Dated: August 26, 2015
13
14
15
16
DAD:10
mix0524.fifp
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?