Womack v. Windsor, et al

Filing 91

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/22/2018 DENYING as moot 86 Plaintiff's motion. Defendants' reply to the objections, if any, to be filed on or before 3/26/2018. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RODNEY JEROME WOMACK,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0533 MCE KJN P

v.

ORDER

J. WINDSOR, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On March 13, 2018, defendants were

17
18

directed to file a status report concerning plaintiff’s legal property, and plaintiff was directed to

19

file objections to the pending findings and recommendations within 14 days from the date he

20

receives his property. On March 14, 2018, plaintiff’s objections were entered on the court docket.

21

On March 19, 2018, defendants filed their response, stating that plaintiff received his legal

22

property on February 27, 2018. Thus, it appears that plaintiff’s motion for the return of his legal

23

property is now moot.
Because plaintiff’s objections crossed in the mail with the court’s order, defendants are

24
25

granted an additional five days to file a reply to the objections, if any.

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

27

1. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 86) is denied as moot; and

28

////
1

1
2

2. Defendants’ reply to the objections, if any, shall be filed on or before March 26, 2018.
Dated: March 22, 2018

3
4
5

/woma0533.leg

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2