Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians et al v. Crosby et al

Filing 116

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/9/2015 GRANTING 113 Ex Parte Application. These defendants are not required to respond to the First Amended Complaint but are instead ORDERED to Respondent to the forthcoming Second Amended Complaint on 11/2/2015, pursuant to 107 Order. (Donati, J)

1
2
3

John M. Murray (232419)
Liberty Law, A.P.C.
2150 N. Main Street, STE 10
Red Bluff, CA 96080
530-529-4329
[e-mail]

4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY;
LESLIE LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA; JON PATA;
CHRIS PATA; SHERRY MYERS; FRANK JAMES; PATRIOT
GOLD AND SILVER EXCHANGE, INC. AND NORMAN
RYAN

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

SACRAMENTO DIVISION
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI
INDIANS; and PASKENTA
ENTERPRISES CORPORATION,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs,
v.
INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY; LESLIE
LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA;
JUAN PATA; CHRIS PATA; SHERRY
MYERS; FRANK JAMES; UMPQUA
BANK; UMPQUA HOLDINGS
CORPORATION; CORNERSTONE
COMMUNITY BANK; CORNERSTONE
COMMUNITY BANCORP; JEFFRY
FINCK; GARTH MOORE; GARTH
MOORE INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.; ASSOCIATED
PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC.;
HANESS & ASSOCIATES, LLC;
ROBERT M. HANESS; THE PATRIOT
GOLD & SERVER EXCHANGE, INC; and
NORMAN R. RYAN,

Case No. 15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS INES
CROSBY, JOHN CROSBY, LESLIE
LOHSE, LARRY LOHSE, TED PATA,
JON PATA, CHRIS PATA, SHERRY
MYERS AND FRANK JAMES’ EX PARTE
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Defendants.
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.; CRP 111 WEST
141ST STREET LLC; CASTELLAN
MANAGING MEMBER LLC; CRP WEST
168TH STREET LLC; and CRP SHERMAN
AVENUE LLC,
Nominal Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
Case No. 15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK

1

Defendants Ines Crosby, John Crosby, Leslie Lohse, Larry Lohse, Ted Pata, Jon

2

Pata, Chris Pata, Sherry Myers and Frank James’ Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise

3

Plead to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 113), is GRANTED. These Defendants

4

are not required to respond to the First Amended Complaint but are instead ordered to respond to

5

the forthcoming Second Amended Complaint on November 2, 2015, pursuant to the Order filed

6

August 24, 2015 (ECF No. 107).

7

Dated: September 9, 2015

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
Case No. 15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK