Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians et al v. Crosby et al

Filing 240

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/22/2016 ORDERING Defendant Associated Pension Consultants, LLC to respond to the 212 Third Amended Complaint by 7/10/2016. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6

William A. Munoz - 191649
[e-mail]
Heather A. Barnes - 263107
[e-mail]
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
520 Capitol Mall, Suite 250
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
ASSOCIATED PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC.

7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12

PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS;
and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES
CORPORATION,

13

Case No.: 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiffs,

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

14

v.

15

INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY; LESLIE
LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA; JUAN
PATA; CHRIS PATA; SHERRY MYERS;
FRANK JAMES; UMPQUA BANK; UMPQUA
HOLDINGS CORPORATION; CORNERSTONE
COMMUNITY BANK; CORNERSTONE
COMMUNITY BANCORP; JEFFERY FINCK;
GARTH MOORE; GARTH MOORE
INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES,
INC.; ASSOCIATED PENSION
CONSULTANTS, INC.; HANESS &
ASSOCIATES, LLC; ROBERT M. HANESS;
THE PATRIOT GOLD & SILVER EXCHANGE,
INC.; and NORMAN R. RYAN,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Defendants.
23
24
WHEREAS, on May 20, 2016, the PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS; and

25
26

PASKENTA ENTERRISES CORPORATION filed the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) in this

27

action.

28

-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIM EFOR ASSOCIATION PENSION CONSULTANTS,
LLC TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER

CASE NO.
2:15-CV00538-MCECMK

1

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant ASSOCATED PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC.,

2

William A. Munoz, is out of the country and will not return to the United States until July 3, 2016.

3

WHEREAS, any motion to dismiss the TAC by Defendant ASSOCATED PENSION

4
5

CONSULTANTS, INC would be due on June 20, 2016.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant ASSOCIATED PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC.

6

agree that it would be in the best interests of these parties to revise the briefing schedule mandated by

7

the applicable rules:

8

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and ASSOCIATED PENSION

9

CONSULTANTS, LLC, on the other hand, by their respective counsel, pursuant to Civil Local Rules

10
11
12

143 and 144, and subject to approval by the Court:
Defendant ASSOCIATED PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC. must file its response to the
Third Amended Complaint no later than July 10, 2016.

13

If ASSOCIATED PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC.’s response to the Third Amended

14

Complaint is a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), Plaintiffs will have 30 days from

15

the date the motion is filed to file an opposition.

16

Dated: June 22, 2016
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY

17
18

By /s/William A. Munoz
William A. Munoz
Attorneys for Defendant
ASSOCIATED PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

DATED: June 20, 2016
GROSS LAW FIRM, P.C.
By /s/ Andrew M. Purdy_________________________
Andrew W. Purdy
Attorneys for Plaintiffs PASKENTA BAND OF
NOMLAKI INDIANS and PASKENTA
ENTERPRISES CORPORATION

27
28

-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIM EFOR ASSOCIATION PENSION CONSULTANTS,
LLC TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER

CASE NO.
2:15-CV00538-MCECMK

1
2
3
4
5

ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, Defendant The ASSOCIATED
PENSION CONSULTANTS, LLC’S response to the Third Amended Complaint shall be filed no later
than July 10, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: June 22, 2016

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIM EFOR ASSOCIATION PENSION CONSULTANTS,
LLC TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER

CASE NO.
2:15-CV00538-MCECMK