Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians et al v. Crosby et al
Filing
342
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/6/2017 ORDERING that Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner are DISMISSED with Prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Stuart G. Gross (SBN: 251019)
sgross@gross-law.com
GROSS & KLEIN LLP
The Embarcadero
Pier 9, Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94111
Attorneys for Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians
and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation
Katherine A. Wolf (SBN: 267763)
kwolf@shb.com
SHOOK HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
One Montgomery St., Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104
Tel: 415.544.1900
Fax: 415.391.0281
Attorneys for Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS;
and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES
CORPORATION,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiffs,
vs.
INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY; LESLIE
LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA; JUAN
PATA; CHRIS PATA; SHERRY MYERS;
FRANK JAMES; UMPQUA BANK;
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION;
CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANK;
CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANCORP;
JEFFERY FINCK; GARTH MOORE; GARTH
MOORE INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.; ASSOCIATED PENSION
CONSULTANTS, INC.; THE PATRIOT
GOLD & SILVER EXCHANGE, INC.; GDK
CONSULTING LLC; and GREG KESNER,
Case No. 2:15-cv-000538-MCE-CMK
PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS GDK
CONSULTING LLC AND GREG KESNER
Defendants.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO GDK CONSULTING & GREG
KESNER
CASE NO: 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK
1
This stipulation is entered into by Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the
2
Paskenta Enterprises Corporation and Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner
3
(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel:
4
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Parties stipulate to dismissal
5
of Plaintiffs’ claims in the action against Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner in their
6
entirety with prejudice pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement entered into between the
7
Parties, with each Party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. No claim by Plaintiffs the
8
Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation against any other
9
Defendant in this action is affected.
10
11
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 2, 2016
GROSS & KLEIN LLP
12
By:______/s/ Stuart G. Gross
STUART G. GROSS
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of
Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta Enterprises
Corporation
15
16
Dated: December 2, 2016
SHOOK HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
17
By: _____/s/ Katherine A. Wolf
KATHERINE A. WOLF
18
19
Attorneys for Defendants
GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO GDK CONSULTING & GREG KESNER
CASE NO: 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the above-entitled
3
action is HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and
4
Greg Kesner. No claim by Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta
5
Enterprises Corporation against any other Defendant in this action is affected.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated: January 6, 2017
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO GDK CONSULTING & GREG KESNER
CASE NO: 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?