Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians et al v. Crosby et al

Filing 342

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/6/2017 ORDERING that Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner are DISMISSED with Prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Stuart G. Gross (SBN: 251019) sgross@gross-law.com GROSS & KLEIN LLP The Embarcadero Pier 9, Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94111 Attorneys for Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation Katherine A. Wolf (SBN: 267763) kwolf@shb.com SHOOK HARDY & BACON L.L.P. One Montgomery St., Suite 2700 San Francisco, California 94104 Tel: 415.544.1900 Fax: 415.391.0281 Attorneys for Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS; and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiffs, vs. INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY; LESLIE LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA; JUAN PATA; CHRIS PATA; SHERRY MYERS; FRANK JAMES; UMPQUA BANK; UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION; CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANK; CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANCORP; JEFFERY FINCK; GARTH MOORE; GARTH MOORE INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; ASSOCIATED PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC.; THE PATRIOT GOLD & SILVER EXCHANGE, INC.; GDK CONSULTING LLC; and GREG KESNER, Case No. 2:15-cv-000538-MCE-CMK PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS GDK CONSULTING LLC AND GREG KESNER Defendants. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO GDK CONSULTING & GREG KESNER CASE NO: 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK 1 This stipulation is entered into by Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the 2 Paskenta Enterprises Corporation and Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner 3 (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel: 4 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Parties stipulate to dismissal 5 of Plaintiffs’ claims in the action against Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner in their 6 entirety with prejudice pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement entered into between the 7 Parties, with each Party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. No claim by Plaintiffs the 8 Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation against any other 9 Defendant in this action is affected. 10 11 Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 2, 2016 GROSS & KLEIN LLP 12 By:______/s/ Stuart G. Gross STUART G. GROSS 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation 15 16 Dated: December 2, 2016 SHOOK HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 17 By: _____/s/ Katherine A. Wolf KATHERINE A. WOLF 18 19 Attorneys for Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and Greg Kesner 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO GDK CONSULTING & GREG KESNER CASE NO: 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the above-entitled 3 action is HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants GDK Consulting LLC and 4 Greg Kesner. No claim by Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta 5 Enterprises Corporation against any other Defendant in this action is affected. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: January 6, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO GDK CONSULTING & GREG KESNER CASE NO: 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?