Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians et al v. Crosby et al

Filing 479

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/10/2020 GRANTING 469 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The law firm of Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP is TERMED as counsel of record for Defendants Ines Crosby, John Crosby, Leslie Lohse, L arry Lohse, Ted Pata, Juan Pata, Chris Pata, Sherry Myers, and Frank James, effective upon the filing of a proof of service of this signed Order on said Defendants. Defendants will be proceeding in propia persona, pending the submission of any substitution of counsel. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP ELLIOT R. PETERS - # 158708 epeters@kvn.com MATTHEW WERDEGAR - # 200470 mwerdegar@kvn.com ERIN E. MEYER - #274244 emeyer@keker.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 Attorneys for Defendants INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY; LESLIE LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA; JUAN PATA; CHRIS PATA; SHERRY MYERS; FRANK JAMES 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS; and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. INES CROSBY; et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-MCE -CMK ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS INES CROSBY, JOHN CROSBY, LESLIE LOHSE, LARRY LOHSE, TED PATA, JUAN PATA, CHRIS PATA, SHERRY MYERS, AND FRANK JAMES. 17 18 19 Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: January 9, 2020 2:00 p.m. 7 Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. 20 Date Filed: March 10, 2015 21 22 23 24 Before the Court is the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendants Ines Crosby, John 25 Crosby, Leslie Lohse, Larry Lohse, Ted Pata, Juan Pata, Chris Pata, Sherry Myers, and Frank 26 James (the “Defendants”) filed by Defendants’ counsel, the law firm of Keker, Van Nest & Peters 27 LLP on November 27, 2019. ECF No. 469. This matter was scheduled for hearing on January 9, 28 2020 in Courtroom 7, before the Honorable Morrison C. England of the above-entitled Court, and 30 31 1358107 32 1 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-MCE -CMK 1 subsequently was submitted on the papers. On December 19, 2019, Plaintiffs and Defendant 2 Associated Pension Consultants, Inc. filed Statements of Non-Opposition to Defendants’ Motion. 3 ECF Nos. 478, 479. No opposition was submitted by Defendants, and the Declaration of Erin E. 4 Meyer indicates that Defendants were each contacted by counsel and expressly consented to 5 counsel’s withdrawal. 6 This motion is governed by the requirements of Local Rule 182(d), which provides that 7 an attorney may not withdraw, leaving a client in propria persona, absent noticed motion and an 8 affidavit from counsel showing the efforts made to provide notification of the attorney’s intent to 9 withdraw. Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP has complied with those requirements and its request 10 11 12 to withdraw is accordingly proper. Because counsel’s request is both procedurally correct and unopposed, the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (ECF No. 469) is GRANTED. The law firm of Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP is consequently relieved as counsel of record for Defendants effective upon the 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 filing of a proof of service of this signed Order on said Defendant. Pending the submission of any substitution of counsel filed by Ines Crosby, John Crosby, Leslie Lohse, Larry Lohse, Ted Pata, Juan Pata, Chris Pata, Sherry Myers, and/or Frank James, the Clerk is notified that these Defendants are proceeding in propia persona, and their addresses are listed in the Declaration of Erin E. Meyer filed concurrently with the Motion to Withdraw. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 10, 2020 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 1358107 32 2 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-MCE -CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?