Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians et al v. Crosby et al

Filing 97

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 7/29/15 ORDERING that the Clerk is instructed to remove Dkt. No. [72-2] from the case file; and Plaintiffs may file the attached redacted copy of Dkt. No. [72-2]. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 STUART G. GROSS (#251019) sgross@gross-law.com DAN C. GOLDBERG (#287923) dgoldberg@gross-law.com GROSS LAW, P.C. The Embarcadero Pier 9, Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94111 t (415) 671-4628 f (415) 480-6688 7 8 JOSEPH R. SAVERI (#130064) jsaveri@saverilawfirm.com ANDREW M. PURDY (#261912) apurdy@saverilawfirm.com KEVIN E. RAYHILL (#267496) krayhill@saverilawfirm.com JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, INC. 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625 San Francisco, CA 94111 t (415) 500-6800 f (415) 395-9940 Attorneys for Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS; and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY; LESLIE LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA; JUAN PATA; CHRIS PATA; SHERRY MYERS; FRANK JAMES; UMPQUA BANK; UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION; CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANK; CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANCORP; JEFFERY FINCK; GARTH MOORE; GARTH MOORE INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; ASSOCIATED PENSION CONSULTANTS, INC.; HANESS & ASSOCIATES, LLC; ROBERT M. HANESS; THE PATRIOT GOLD & SILVER EXCHANGE, INC.; and NORMAN R. RYAN, Defendants, CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-00538-GEBCMK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2 QUICKEN LOANS, INC.; CRP 111 WEST 141ST LLC; CASTELLAN MANAGING MEMBER LLC.; CRP WEST 168TH STREET LLC; and CRP SHERMAN AVENUE LLC, Nominal Defendants. 26 27 28 GROSS LAW, P.C. THE EMBARCADERO PIER 9, SUITE 100 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2; Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK 1 WHEREAS, on June 29, 2015, the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta 2 Enterprises Corporation (“Plaintiffs”) filed their Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 3 (“Motion”), Dkt. No. 72, which seeks to freeze the assets of Defendants Ines Crosby, John 4 Crosby, Leslie Lohse, and Larry Lohse (“Defendants”); 5 WHEREAS, due to an oversight by Plaintiffs, Dkt. No. 72-2, the Declaration of Brandin 6 Paya in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion was filed with an attached Exhibit A which failed to 7 redact certain private, identifying information of Defendants’, including full social security 8 numbers, home addresses, dates of birth, and driver’s license numbers; 9 10 WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 140 requires the redaction of such identifying information; 11 WHEREAS, all information filed with the Court is of public record; 12 WHEREAS, the identifying information contained in Dkt. No. 72-2, Ex. A, may be 13 14 15 16 17 18 readily accessed and used to perpetrate a criminal act; WHEREAS, the parties are in full agreement that the confidential identifying information should be prevented from public access; WHEREAS, the following redactions have been made to Dkt. No. 72-2, Ex. A, a copy of which is submitted herewith: 1. redacted; 19 20 On page 2, Jon Pata’s social security number and date of birth have been 2. On page 7, entitled “Currency Transaction Report,” Ines Crosby’s home address, 21 driver’s license number, social security number, and date of birth have been 22 redacted; 23 3. social security number, and P.O. Box number have been redacted; 24 25 4. On page 9, Ines Crosby’s home address and social security number have been redacted from her W-9 tax form; 26 27 On page 8, Ines Crosby’s driver’s license number, home address, date of birth, 5. On page 12, Ines Crosby’s home address, driver’s license number, social security 28 GROSS LAW, P.C. THE EMBARCADERO PIER 9, SUITE 100 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2; Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK 1 number, and date of birth have been redacted; and 1 2 6. On page 19, the home addresses of each of the individuals listed have been redacted. 3 4 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and 6 through their respective counsel, pursuant to 5.2(a) and Civil Local Rules 140 and 143, and 7 subject to approval by the Court, that: 8 1. The Clerk is instructed to remove Dkt. No. 72-2 from the case file; and 9 2. Plaintiffs may file the attached redacted copy of Dkt. No. 72-2. 10 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: 12 13 14 DATED: July 29, 15 GROSS LAW, P.C. 15 By: /s/ Daniel Goldberg ______________ 16 Daniel C. Goldberg Attorneys for Plaintiffs PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED: July 29, 15 LIBERTY LAW, A.P.C. By: /s/ John Murray (as authorized on July 28, 2015) John M. Murray Attorneys for Defendants INES CROSBY, JOHN CROSBY, LESLIE LOHSE, LARRY LOHSE, TED PATA, JUAN PATA, CHRIS PATA, SHERRY MYERS, FRANK JAMES, THE PATRIOT GOLD & SILVER EXCHANGE, INC., and NORMAN R. RYAN 27 28 GROSS LAW, P.C. THE EMBARCADERO PIER 9, SUITE 100 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2; Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK 2 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 29, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GROSS LAW, P.C. THE EMBARCADERO PIER 9, SUITE 100 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2; Case No. 2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?