Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians et al v. Crosby et al
Filing
97
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 7/29/15 ORDERING that the Clerk is instructed to remove Dkt. No. [72-2] from the case file; and Plaintiffs may file the attached redacted copy of Dkt. No. [72-2]. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
STUART G. GROSS (#251019)
sgross@gross-law.com
DAN C. GOLDBERG (#287923)
dgoldberg@gross-law.com
GROSS LAW, P.C.
The Embarcadero
Pier 9, Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94111
t (415) 671-4628
f (415) 480-6688
7
8
JOSEPH R. SAVERI (#130064)
jsaveri@saverilawfirm.com
ANDREW M. PURDY (#261912)
apurdy@saverilawfirm.com
KEVIN E. RAYHILL (#267496)
krayhill@saverilawfirm.com
JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, INC.
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 625
San Francisco, CA 94111
t (415) 500-6800
f (415) 395-9940
Attorneys for Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians
and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS;
and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES
CORPORATION,
Plaintiffs,
v.
INES CROSBY; JOHN CROSBY; LESLIE
LOHSE; LARRY LOHSE; TED PATA; JUAN
PATA; CHRIS PATA; SHERRY MYERS;
FRANK JAMES; UMPQUA BANK; UMPQUA
HOLDINGS CORPORATION;
CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANK;
CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY BANCORP;
JEFFERY FINCK; GARTH MOORE; GARTH
MOORE INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.; ASSOCIATED PENSION
CONSULTANTS, INC.; HANESS &
ASSOCIATES, LLC; ROBERT M. HANESS;
THE PATRIOT GOLD & SILVER
EXCHANGE, INC.; and NORMAN R. RYAN,
Defendants,
CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-00538-GEBCMK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED
REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO.
72-2
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.; CRP 111 WEST
141ST LLC; CASTELLAN MANAGING
MEMBER LLC.; CRP WEST 168TH STREET
LLC; and CRP SHERMAN AVENUE LLC,
Nominal Defendants.
26
27
28
GROSS LAW, P.C.
THE EMBARCADERO
PIER 9, SUITE 100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94111
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2; Case No.
2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK
1
WHEREAS, on June 29, 2015, the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta
2
Enterprises Corporation (“Plaintiffs”) filed their Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
3
(“Motion”), Dkt. No. 72, which seeks to freeze the assets of Defendants Ines Crosby, John
4
Crosby, Leslie Lohse, and Larry Lohse (“Defendants”);
5
WHEREAS, due to an oversight by Plaintiffs, Dkt. No. 72-2, the Declaration of Brandin
6
Paya in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion was filed with an attached Exhibit A which failed to
7
redact certain private, identifying information of Defendants’, including full social security
8
numbers, home addresses, dates of birth, and driver’s license numbers;
9
10
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 140 requires the redaction of such identifying
information;
11
WHEREAS, all information filed with the Court is of public record;
12
WHEREAS, the identifying information contained in Dkt. No. 72-2, Ex. A, may be
13
14
15
16
17
18
readily accessed and used to perpetrate a criminal act;
WHEREAS, the parties are in full agreement that the confidential identifying
information should be prevented from public access;
WHEREAS, the following redactions have been made to Dkt. No. 72-2, Ex. A, a copy of
which is submitted herewith:
1.
redacted;
19
20
On page 2, Jon Pata’s social security number and date of birth have been
2.
On page 7, entitled “Currency Transaction Report,” Ines Crosby’s home address,
21
driver’s license number, social security number, and date of birth have been
22
redacted;
23
3.
social security number, and P.O. Box number have been redacted;
24
25
4.
On page 9, Ines Crosby’s home address and social security number have been
redacted from her W-9 tax form;
26
27
On page 8, Ines Crosby’s driver’s license number, home address, date of birth,
5.
On page 12, Ines Crosby’s home address, driver’s license number, social security
28
GROSS LAW, P.C.
THE EMBARCADERO
PIER 9, SUITE 100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94111
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2; Case No.
2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK
1
number, and date of birth have been redacted; and
1
2
6.
On page 19, the home addresses of each of the individuals listed have been
redacted.
3
4
5
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and
6
through their respective counsel, pursuant to 5.2(a) and Civil Local Rules 140 and 143, and
7
subject to approval by the Court, that:
8
1.
The Clerk is instructed to remove Dkt. No. 72-2 from the case file; and
9
2.
Plaintiffs may file the attached redacted copy of Dkt. No. 72-2.
10
11
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
12
13
14
DATED: July 29, 15
GROSS LAW, P.C.
15
By:
/s/ Daniel Goldberg ______________
16
Daniel C. Goldberg
Attorneys for Plaintiffs PASKENTA BAND
OF NOMLAKI INDIANS and PASKENTA
ENTERPRISES CORPORATION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
DATED: July 29, 15
LIBERTY LAW, A.P.C.
By:
/s/ John Murray (as authorized on July 28, 2015)
John M. Murray
Attorneys for Defendants INES CROSBY,
JOHN CROSBY, LESLIE LOHSE, LARRY
LOHSE, TED PATA, JUAN PATA, CHRIS
PATA, SHERRY MYERS, FRANK JAMES,
THE PATRIOT GOLD & SILVER
EXCHANGE, INC., and NORMAN R.
RYAN
27
28
GROSS LAW, P.C.
THE EMBARCADERO
PIER 9, SUITE 100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94111
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2; Case No.
2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK
2
1
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 29, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GROSS LAW, P.C.
THE EMBARCADERO
PIER 9, SUITE 100
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94111
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2; Case No.
2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?