Sexton v. State of California

Filing 12

ORDER adopting in full 10 the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 10/30/15. Plaintiff's 9 amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PATRICIA D. SEXTON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0542 GEB AC

v.

ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff is proceed in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States

17
18

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

19

On September 23, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff

22

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 11.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

23
24

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

25

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

26

analysis.

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 23, 2015, are adopted in full; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 9, is dismissed without leave to amend.

4

Dated: October 30, 2015

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2