De Jesus-Edmunson v. City of Sacramento

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/5/2017 CONTINUING discovery cut-off date to 9/14/2017. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Anthony Goldsmith, Esq. (State Bar #: 125621) LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY E. GOLDSMITH 1841 Arteique Road Topanga, CA 90290 Tel.: (818) 343-1370 Fax: (310) 455-2968 E-Mail: agoldsmith@goldsmithlawoffices.com Attorney for Plaintiff, CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON Steven L. Derby, Esq. (State Bar # 148372) THE DERBY LAW FIRM 1255 Treat Blvd., Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Tel.: (925) 472-6640 Fax: (925) 472-6643 E-Mail: derby@derbydisabilitylaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff, CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON Katherine E. Underwood, Esq. (State Bar # 249308) SACRAMENTO CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 915 I St., 4th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel.: (916) 808-5346 Fax: (916) 808-7455 E-Mail: kunderwood2@cityofsacramento.org Attorney for Defendant, CITY OF SACRAMENTO 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 20 21 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINES Plaintiff, 18 19 Case No.: 2:15-CV-00550-TLN-CKD CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON, vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO; and DOES 150, Inclusive, Defendants. 23 Plaintiff, CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON, and Defendant, CITY OF 24 SACRAMENTO, by and through their respective attorneys, Anthony E. Goldsmith, Steven 25 L. Derby, and Katherine E. Underwood, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request the 26 trial date and pretrial deadlines in this case to be continued for good cause as shown below. 27 Presently, trial in this case is scheduled to begin on June 4, 2018. This request for an 28 extension of discovery deadlines is based on the following good cause: 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY DEADLINE 1 1. On March 11, 2015, Plaintiff, by and through counsel, filed her Complaint for 2 damages and injunctive relief, arising out of an incident that occurred on or about 3 February 20, 2014, which involves the alleged deprivation of Plaintiff’s civil 4 rights, as well as personal injuries. 5 2. Plaintiff has endured two serious illnesses unrelated to her injuries allegedly 6 sustained in the case before the Court. Additionally, Plaintiff is in the process of 7 recovering additional medical records related to this case and both parties want to 8 be sure that Defendants have all of Plaintiff’s medical records before taking her 9 deposition. Accordingly, the parties ask that the Court to extend the discovery cut-off date in this case from July 14, 2017 to September 14, 2017. 10 11 3. This request for an extension of discovery deadlines will not impact the trial date 12 or any other discovery and motion dates in the case and although the parties 13 understand the importance of keeping the Court’s timeline, all involved are 14 working together cooperatively and believe the extension will likely result in 15 further settlement discussions, as opposed to having to proceed to trial. 16 4. Based on the foregoing, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court 17 continue the current discovery cut-off date from July 14, 2017 to September 14, 18 2017. 19 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO STPULATED DATED: May 3, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY E. GOLDSMITH By: /s/ Anthony Goldsmith Anthony E. Goldsmith Attorney for Plaintiff, CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY DEADLINE 1 2 DATED: May 3, 2017 3 By: /s/ Steven Derby Steven Derby Attorney for Plaintiff, CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON 4 5 6 THE DERBY LAW FIRM DATED: May 3, 2017 7 SACRAMENTO CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 8 By: /s/ Katherine Underwood Katherine E. Underwood Attorney for Defendant, CITY OF SACRAMENTO 9 10 11 12 13 THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: May 05, 2017 16 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?