De Jesus-Edmunson v. City of Sacramento
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/5/2017 CONTINUING discovery cut-off date to 9/14/2017. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Anthony Goldsmith, Esq. (State Bar #: 125621)
LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY E. GOLDSMITH
1841 Arteique Road
Topanga, CA 90290
Tel.: (818) 343-1370
Fax: (310) 455-2968
E-Mail: agoldsmith@goldsmithlawoffices.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON
Steven L. Derby, Esq. (State Bar # 148372)
THE DERBY LAW FIRM
1255 Treat Blvd., Suite 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Tel.: (925) 472-6640
Fax: (925) 472-6643
E-Mail: derby@derbydisabilitylaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON
Katherine E. Underwood, Esq. (State Bar # 249308)
SACRAMENTO CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
915 I St., 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel.: (916) 808-5346
Fax: (916) 808-7455
E-Mail: kunderwood2@cityofsacramento.org
Attorney for Defendant, CITY OF SACRAMENTO
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
20
21
22
STIPULATION AND
ORDER CONTINUING FACT
DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Plaintiff,
18
19
Case No.: 2:15-CV-00550-TLN-CKD
CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON,
vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; and DOES 150, Inclusive,
Defendants.
23
Plaintiff, CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON, and Defendant, CITY OF
24
SACRAMENTO, by and through their respective attorneys, Anthony E. Goldsmith, Steven
25
L. Derby, and Katherine E. Underwood, hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request the
26
trial date and pretrial deadlines in this case to be continued for good cause as shown below.
27
Presently, trial in this case is scheduled to begin on June 4, 2018. This request for an
28
extension of discovery deadlines is based on the following good cause:
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY DEADLINE
1
1.
On March 11, 2015, Plaintiff, by and through counsel, filed her Complaint for
2
damages and injunctive relief, arising out of an incident that occurred on or about
3
February 20, 2014, which involves the alleged deprivation of Plaintiff’s civil
4
rights, as well as personal injuries.
5
2.
Plaintiff has endured two serious illnesses unrelated to her injuries allegedly
6
sustained in the case before the Court. Additionally, Plaintiff is in the process of
7
recovering additional medical records related to this case and both parties want to
8
be sure that Defendants have all of Plaintiff’s medical records before taking her
9
deposition. Accordingly, the parties ask that the Court to extend the discovery
cut-off date in this case from July 14, 2017 to September 14, 2017.
10
11
3.
This request for an extension of discovery deadlines will not impact the trial date
12
or any other discovery and motion dates in the case and although the parties
13
understand the importance of keeping the Court’s timeline, all involved are
14
working together cooperatively and believe the extension will likely result in
15
further settlement discussions, as opposed to having to proceed to trial.
16
4.
Based on the foregoing, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court
17
continue the current discovery cut-off date from July 14, 2017 to September 14,
18
2017.
19
20
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO STPULATED
DATED: May 3, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY E. GOLDSMITH
By: /s/ Anthony Goldsmith
Anthony E. Goldsmith
Attorney for Plaintiff,
CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY DEADLINE
1
2
DATED: May 3, 2017
3
By: /s/ Steven Derby
Steven Derby
Attorney for Plaintiff,
CYNTHIA DE JESUS-EDMUNSON
4
5
6
THE DERBY LAW FIRM
DATED: May 3, 2017
7
SACRAMENTO CITY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE
8
By: /s/ Katherine Underwood
Katherine E. Underwood
Attorney for Defendant,
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
9
10
11
12
13
THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IS APPROVED AND IT IS SO
ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: May 05, 2017
16
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY DEADLINE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?