(PS) Maxey v. Office of President Barack Obama et al
Filing
25
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/30/15 ORDERING that this case be RELATED to case number 2:15-CV-01349 MCE-AC and that the related case be REASSIGNED to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings.(Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES C. MAXEY,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT BARACK
OBAMA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
JAMES C. MAXEY,
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
20
Defendants.
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:15-CV-00552 JAM-EFB
RELATED CASE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-CV-01349 MCE-AC
Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these
23
actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal.
24
2005).
25
judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial
26
savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for
27
the parties.
28
Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same
The parties should be aware that relating the cases under
1
1
Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are
2
assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation
3
of the actions is effected.
4
court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and
5
magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.
Under the regular practice of this
6
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated 2:15-CV-
7
01349 MCE-AC be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate
8
Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings.
9
the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be
10
11
12
13
14
Henceforth,
shown as 2:15-CV-01349 JAM-EFB.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 30, 2015
/s/ John A. Mendez________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?