(PS) Maxey v. Office of President Barack Obama et al

Filing 25

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/30/15 ORDERING that this case be RELATED to case number 2:15-CV-01349 MCE-AC and that the related case be REASSIGNED to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings.(Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES C. MAXEY, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 JAMES C. MAXEY, 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 20 Defendants. 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-CV-00552 JAM-EFB RELATED CASE ORDER Case No. 2:15-CV-01349 MCE-AC Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 23 actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 24 2005). 25 judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial 26 savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for 27 the parties. 28 Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 1 1 Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 2 assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 3 of the actions is effected. 4 court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 5 magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. Under the regular practice of this 6 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated 2:15-CV- 7 01349 MCE-AC be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate 8 Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings. 9 the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be 10 11 12 13 14 Henceforth, shown as 2:15-CV-01349 JAM-EFB. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2015 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?