Martinez v. Holder, et al
Filing
6
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/31/15 ORDERING pursuant to the joint stipulation, the time for filing a response to the Petition is extended to September 30, 2015. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
Eastern District of California
United States Attorney’s Office
501 I Street
Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 554-2700
audrey.hemesath@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ANAMARIA MARTINEZ,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
ERIC HOLDER JR., ET AL.,
14
Defendants.
) Case No.: 2:15-cv-00554-JAM-KJN
)
) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
)
)
)
)
15
16
IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED AND STIPULATED by and between the parties, pursuant
17
to L.R. 144(a), to extend the deadline by which Defendants may file their response to Plaintiff’s
18
Petition for Review of the Denial of a Naturalization Application Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c)
19
and Request for De Novo Hearing (ECF No. 1). Defendants request a 30-day extension of time
20
in which to respond to the Petition, and Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
21
22
DATED: August 31, 2015
/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
23
24
25
26
27
DATED: August 31, 2015
/s/ Wazhma Mojaddidi
WAZHMA MOJADDIDI, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff
28
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Petition - 1
2:15-cv-00554-JAM-KJN
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the joint stipulation, the time for filing a response to the Petition is extended
3
to September 30, 2015.
4
DATED: August 31, 2015
5
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
6
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Petition - 2
2:15-cv-00554-JAM-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?