Martinez v. Holder, et al

Filing 6

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/31/15 ORDERING pursuant to the joint stipulation, the time for filing a response to the Petition is extended to September 30, 2015. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney Eastern District of California United States Attorney’s Office 501 I Street Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 554-2700 audrey.hemesath@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANAMARIA MARTINEZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. ERIC HOLDER JR., ET AL., 14 Defendants. ) Case No.: 2:15-cv-00554-JAM-KJN ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) ) 15 16 IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED AND STIPULATED by and between the parties, pursuant 17 to L.R. 144(a), to extend the deadline by which Defendants may file their response to Plaintiff’s 18 Petition for Review of the Denial of a Naturalization Application Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c) 19 and Request for De Novo Hearing (ECF No. 1). Defendants request a 30-day extension of time 20 in which to respond to the Petition, and Plaintiff does not oppose this request. 21 22 DATED: August 31, 2015 /s/ Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 23 24 25 26 27 DATED: August 31, 2015 /s/ Wazhma Mojaddidi WAZHMA MOJADDIDI, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff 28 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Petition - 1 2:15-cv-00554-JAM-KJN ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the joint stipulation, the time for filing a response to the Petition is extended 3 to September 30, 2015. 4 DATED: August 31, 2015 5 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ 6 United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Petition - 2 2:15-cv-00554-JAM-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?