Ngissah v. Shelton

Filing 6

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/15/2015 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action; AND RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRANCIS AMITEYE NGISSAH,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-0557 DAD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND

OFFICER SHELTON et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed March 23, 2015, plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file a civil

18

rights complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of

19

Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Plaintiff was also ordered to file a complete in

20

forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. The court cautioned

21

plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation for dismissal of

22

this action without prejudice. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not

23

complied with the court’s order or otherwise responded to it.

24
25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to
randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

26

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

27

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

28

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
1

1

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

3

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

4

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

5

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

Dated: May 15, 2015

7
8
9

DAD:9
ngis0557.nocompl(2)

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2