Harrell v. Walmart et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/27/17 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal (USM) is directed to serve within 90 days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civ il Procedure 4, without prepayment of costs. The Clerk shall send plaintiff all the documents required for service by the USM. Within 30 days after service of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the required documents to the court. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSHUA N. HARRELL,
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
Order
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-0576 JAM AC (PS)
WAL-MART, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to this
18
19
court for pretrial proceedings by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21).1 On June 23, 2016, the
20
district judge presiding over this case authorized plaintiff, who is also proceeding in forma
21
pauperis, to proceed with his first amended complaint against defendant Michelle Belyea. ECF
22
No. 24.
Plaintiff has diligently attempted to get the materials needed for service of process to be
23
24
re-sent to him. See ECF Nos. 26, 27, 28, 30, 31. The materials were originally sent to him on or
25
about May 5, 2015, when the undersigned screened the original complaint. See ECF No. 8.
26
Plaintiff explains that he has been transferred three times to three different facilities, and no
27
28
1
Although plaintiff indicates that he is in custody, this matter is proceeding under the authority
of Local Rule 302(c)(21), rather than Local Rule 302(c)(17), because plaintiff does not seek
habeas relief, nor does he challenge the conditions of his confinement.
1
1
longer has possession of the documents. See ECF No. 30. Regretfully, plaintiff’s requests have
2
somehow escaped the court’s notice until now.
3
For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal is directed
5
to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Federal
6
Rule of Civil Procedure 4, without prepayment of costs.
7
2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form for defendant Belyea,
8
one summons, a copy of the first amended complaint (ECF No. 15), an instruction
9
sheet, and an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge.
10
11
3. Within thirty days after service of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached
Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:
12
a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents (attached);
13
b. One completed summons;
14
c. One completed USM-285 form for defendant Johnson;
15
d. One copy of this order; and
16
e. Two copies of the first amended complaint (ECF No. 15).
17
4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of service.
18
Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States
19
Marshal to serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
20
Procedure 4 without payment of costs.
21
DATED: January 27, 2017
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JOSHUA N. HARRELL,
11
12
13
No. 2:15-cv-0576 JAM AC (PS)
Plaintiff,
v.
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF
DOCUMENTS
WAL-MART, et al.,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed
_____________________:
____
completed summons forms
____
completed USM-285 forms
____
copies of the complaint
____
consent forms
____
copy of service order
23
24
25
26
____________________________________
Date
____________________________________
Plaintiff
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?