Harrell v. Walmart et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/27/17 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal (USM) is directed to serve within 90 days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civ il Procedure 4, without prepayment of costs. The Clerk shall send plaintiff all the documents required for service by the USM. Within 30 days after service of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the required documents to the court. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA N. HARRELL, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. Order 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-0576 JAM AC (PS) WAL-MART, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to this 18 19 court for pretrial proceedings by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21).1 On June 23, 2016, the 20 district judge presiding over this case authorized plaintiff, who is also proceeding in forma 21 pauperis, to proceed with his first amended complaint against defendant Michelle Belyea. ECF 22 No. 24. Plaintiff has diligently attempted to get the materials needed for service of process to be 23 24 re-sent to him. See ECF Nos. 26, 27, 28, 30, 31. The materials were originally sent to him on or 25 about May 5, 2015, when the undersigned screened the original complaint. See ECF No. 8. 26 Plaintiff explains that he has been transferred three times to three different facilities, and no 27 28 1 Although plaintiff indicates that he is in custody, this matter is proceeding under the authority of Local Rule 302(c)(21), rather than Local Rule 302(c)(17), because plaintiff does not seek habeas relief, nor does he challenge the conditions of his confinement. 1 1 longer has possession of the documents. See ECF No. 30. Regretfully, plaintiff’s requests have 2 somehow escaped the court’s notice until now. 3 For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal is directed 5 to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Federal 6 Rule of Civil Procedure 4, without prepayment of costs. 7 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form for defendant Belyea, 8 one summons, a copy of the first amended complaint (ECF No. 15), an instruction 9 sheet, and an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge. 10 11 3. Within thirty days after service of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court: 12 a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents (attached); 13 b. One completed summons; 14 c. One completed USM-285 form for defendant Johnson; 15 d. One copy of this order; and 16 e. Two copies of the first amended complaint (ECF No. 15). 17 4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of service. 18 Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States 19 Marshal to serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 4 without payment of costs. 21 DATED: January 27, 2017 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSHUA N. HARRELL, 11 12 13 No. 2:15-cv-0576 JAM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS WAL-MART, et al., 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed _____________________: ____ completed summons forms ____ completed USM-285 forms ____ copies of the complaint ____ consent forms ____ copy of service order 23 24 25 26 ____________________________________ Date ____________________________________ Plaintiff 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?