Harrell v. California Forensic Medical Group Inc. et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/20/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's Objections (ECF No. 44 ) filed here on October 17, 2016 are DENIED.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:15-cv-0579 DB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MED.
GROUP, INC., et al.,
Defendant.

17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights
18
action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an order signed September 26 and filed September 27, 2016,
19
20
21

the court denied plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 43.) Plaintiff has filed an
“objection” to the denial of his motion. (ECF Nos. 44, 45.) The court construes plaintiff’s
objections as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order.

22
Under Local Rule 230(j), a party may seek reconsideration of the denial of a motion by
23

showing, among other things, “what new or different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist

24
which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the
25

motion,” and “why the facts or circumstances were not shown at the time of the prior motion.”

26
Plaintiff reiterates the arguments made previously in his April 20, 2016 motion for injunctive
27
relief (ECF No. 37). Because plaintiff has not shown that something new or different from what
28
1

1

he argued previously justifies reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion, IT IS

2

HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “Objections” (ECF No. 44 ) filed here on October 17, 2016

3

are denied.

4

Dated: October 20, 2016

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/Harr0579.recon

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2