Harrell v. California Forensic Medical Group Inc. et al

Filing 82

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/30/2019 ADOPTING 75 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 71 Motion for Relief from Judgment. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-0579 KJM DB P v. ORDER CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MED. GROUP, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 20 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 30, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 22 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 24 findings and recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 27 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 30, 2018, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 71) is denied. 4 DATED: January 30, 2019. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?