Harrell v. California Forensic Medical Group Inc. et al
Filing
82
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/30/2019 ADOPTING 75 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 71 Motion for Relief from Judgment. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-0579 KJM DB P
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MED.
GROUP, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
20
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 30, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
21
22
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
23
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the
24
findings and recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the
27
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 30, 2018, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 71) is denied.
4
DATED: January 30, 2019.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?