Melson Peart v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 26

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/11/16. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 KATHLEEN MELSON PEART, 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. No.: 2:15-CV-0582-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the 23 approval of the Court, that Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant or 24 the Commissioner) has agreed to voluntarily remand this case for further administrative proceedings, 25 pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the 26 case to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for a new hearing and decision. The Appeals Council will 27 instruct the ALJ to consult a medical advisor to assist in the determination of the appropriate disability 28 onset date consistent with Social Security Ruling 83-20. The parties further request that the Clerk of the STIPULATION & ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-CV-0582-AC 1 Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Kathleen M. Peart (Plaintiff), and against 2 Defendant, reversing the Commissioner’s final decision. 3 Respectfully submitted, 4 5 Dated: February 9, 2016 By: /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan* JESSE S. KAPLAN (*As authorized by e-mail on February 9, 2016) Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 JESSE S. KAPLAN ATTORNEY AT LAW Dated: February 9, 2016 10 11 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 12 By: /s/ Sharon Lahey SHARON LAHEY Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED: February 11, 2016 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-CV-0582-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?