Ramirez v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/31/2015 ORDERING the Clerk to send Justice Lui a copy of Mr. Ramirez' letter, together with a copy of this order, and to close this case without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADAM SALAS RAMIREZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:15-cv-0583 AC P
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
16
Respondents.
17
18
On March 13, 2015, this court filed a copy of a January 29, 2015 letter written and sent by
19
Mr. Ramirez, a 73-year-old state prisoner at the California Medical Facility, which was addressed
20
to Justice Elwood Lui, the Compliance Officer appointed by the Three-Judge Court in the class
21
actions Coleman v. Brown, Case No. 2:90-cv-00520 KJM DAD P, and Plata v. Brown, Case No.
22
C01-1351 TEH. The letter states that Mr. Ramirez was denied parole on January 7, 2015, after
23
appearing at an early suitability hearing under the state’s new elderly parole program. No other
24
matters were submitted by Mr. Ramirez. Review of the letter demonstrates that Mr. Ramirez
25
sought to be informational – he states, “I write this letter not to complain but just to let you know
26
that the Board is not complying with the Court’s ruling.” The court finds that this matter was
27
intended not to commence a habeas corpus action in this court, but for review by Justice Lui.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to send
2
Justice Lui a copy of Mr. Ramirez’ letter, together with a copy of this order, and to close this case
3
without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall contact the staff attorney assigned to this case to
4
obtain Justice Lui’s mailing address.
5
DATED: March 31, 2015
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?